Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)

Choosing to be jabbed has wider implications than the jab itself...

Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)

The following post on Facebook has gotten me another  30 day ban for truthspeak crimes. This time it was due to a comment on a research paper published on PubMed. Science is nothing without discussion, and the importance of AMR is such that we should be discussing it and indeed all wider implications of the current policy and push for people to be jabbed.  The supposed scientific advisors also have access to such papers, yet still choose to push the dangerous spike protein producing jabs.  If this isn't a sufficiently good contradiction and indicator that the politics is getting preference over science and health, then I'm not sure what it will take to convince you otherwise?

POST: The authors of the following paper make some very telling statements ....

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8026244/pdf/main.pdf

"The issue with mRNA and adenoviral vectored vaccines is that they all encode the spike protein, which is the hidden mastermind behind a SARS-CoV-2 infection."

and...

"Also, note that it is possible that the vaccines itself might facilitate recombinant mutations." (ignore the poor English! ... themselves!!)

and...

"So in the long term perspective the efficiencies of our current vaccines will keep degrading as the virus mutates till we exhaust our capacity to produce the booster shots on a global scale (Rees-Spear et al., 2021). "

Methinks the more relevant question that arises based on this last quoted statement is "Why continue to use the jabs that turn the body into a spike protein factory?" They should be stopped with immediate effect because it is the spike protein that disrupts our innate immune system. This makes the jabs dangerous in themselves for this reason alone, regardless of the GOF domains. Given the stated finite ability to be able to produce effective boosters (even assuming they are sufficiently effective at all), ongoing jabbing exposes the jabbed people to a higher risk of infection, not just with SARS-CoV2, but ALL infections due to their damaged innate immune system.

This might 😉 explain why the majority of people in COVID wards have been jabbed. On the basis of having a damaged innate immune system, they are therefore likely to become the majority of people who require medical intervention for other infections too. Given that we are already being warned about antibiotic resistance (AMR), the implication is that antibiotic use may have to rise to deal with rise in non-viral infections that the compromised innate immune system can no longer deal with on its own. This is likely to accelerate AMR too.

The idiotic use of these jabs on such a widescale use well before they were fully understood, and well before such adverse events were discovered, because they were rushed through, has a potentially much wider and more harmful significance than just the adverse effects by the jabs themselves on those who have been jabbed. AMR affects us all...

Ironically, the UK Government has a webpage dedicated to highlighting the very problem they are significantly adding to. They cannot claim ignorance!

 

Share:

Related Posts

The Prions are coming...

The Prions are coming...

Sickness is Health

Sickness is Health

NWO History

NWO History

Detention!

Detention!

Jib-Jab Repercussions

Jib-Jab Repercussions

Wave Genetics

Wave Genetics

Save the Kids

Save the Kids