It's a Digital World
The United Nations (UN) has published its plans for a future digital world. It is based largely on the 17 “Sustainable Development Goals” that forms part of Agenda 2030 but expands on some aspects in more detail.
https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/our-common-agenda-policy-brief-gobal-digi-compact-en.pdf
Reading the document in isolation you could be forgiven for thinking that it is rather innocuous and a blueprint for a better future. However, this document does not exist in isolation and the UN does not exist in isolation either. It has a close alliance with the World Economic Forum who have proven over recent years to have greater influence on world Governments than the people of the countries who have elected them. Governments no longer serve the electorate who they are supposed to be serving, but big industrial multinational complexes instead. Governments are more than willing to impose restrictions and measurements on their people that they were not elected to do. Climate change is the big hoax being used to justify the loss of individual human rights and freedoms that enables Governments to have ever tightening controls. You have only to look at the lunacy on full display that argues for solar-generated electricity on one hand at the same time advocating solar dimming to recognise the con, backed by Bill Gates of course who has invested hugely in whatever benefits from the global policies he pushes.
Looking through this UN document in greater detail with these wider influences in mind, what might have seemed to be innocuous is in reality a step by step plan to hold and control the everyday people of the world with digital chains. As with the World Health Organisation pandemic treaty and international health regulations amendments that have to be read together in order to get the full implications of what they mean, the UN is only telling half the truth in this document that I will start to decipher below.
The document starts with the fallacy that only through stronger global governance can world issues be resolved, and that only through digitalization can this be achieved. What they really mean is an increase in control and monitoring so that their narrative and their Utopia (for them) cannot be opposed.
I think it is inevitable that Central Bank Digital Currencies will be introduced. The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) who ultimately oversee banking worldwide have already announced they intend to have a global digital currency. Many individual countries are already investigating and investing in setting up national CBDCs. It could be that there will be a two tier system whereby national debts and transactions exist on the BIS global digital currency platform whilst individual countries run their own national CBDC to control the masses. As the following video discusses, CBDC's facilitate total control of all transactions and the sort of social scoring system that China already has in place. Of course, it won't be rolled out with full controls in place but will initially just feature the undeniably beneficial aspects of CBDC in terms of faster transactions. Once people have become reliant on digital currency and hooked on the positive benefits, it is only a matter of time before cash is removed with little to no opposition from the masses, and the totalitarian controls are introduced. Limits on spending based on carbon credits plus fines for speaking out against the narrative will all be on the cards, literally and figuratively. Maintaining a parallel financial transaction system is imperative if we wish to maintain any degree of freedom.
Of course, you can't have CBDCs without Digital Identity (DI) and moves are already in place to make this widespread and potentially mandatory. As with CBDCs it will start at the thin end of the wedge and gradually widen over time as fast as people start accepting it.
The EU has already announced that outside visitors will have to have digital authorisation called an ETIAS visa waiver in order to visit EU countries starting in 2024. They claim it’s not a visa, but that seems to be more to do with the length of stay it permits (up to 90 days in 180) than any other aspect of it. The new EU ETIAS is likened to the existing ESTA that is a waiver of rights when visiting the USA. How many people have signed the US ESTA in the past without realising what rights exactly they are waiving?! You sign away your right to legal representation, your free phone call to your embassy/family etc if arrested. If you’re thinking you won’t do anything that might get you arrested, wrongful arrest can happen too. Is the ETIAS an equivalent waiver of rights too?! It isn’t clear. In the current authoritarian climate this should be seen as far more of a big deal than we might previously have thought when our freedoms in other directions weren’t so obviously under attack. What’s to stop people just disappearing, especially those of us who are single and self-employed?! Who would raise the alarm and query where I am?
The initial data that will be required and associated with this digital authorisation seems rather innocuous to begin with too, of course. But how long will it be before this individual data is widened to include vaccine status, political persuasion, social score, financial and health status and whatever else that can result in restricting freedom of movement for those who do not follow the narrative on a whole range of issues? The EU has already handed the WHO their digital “Health Certificate” supposedly developed for COVID although the plan was already in place years before that Tedros says they will expand to all countries and increase the data associated with it. As I’ve said on many occasions over the past couple of years, it's not a conspiracy theory when they’re telling us what they’re doing and already starting…
Freedom of movement and to travel is an inalienable right under Common Law. Who gave the EU, or anybody else for that matter, the authority to remove the individual right to travel freely and then use it to hold you over a barrel to coerce you into potentially signing away even more rights? Isn’t our Passport enough already? Bear in mind that in EU countries you are not considered innocent until proven guilty – you have to prove your innocence. When Ireland is introducing laws that make it an arrestable offence for having something you consider a joke and innocuous on your phone that someone has sent you for a laugh, it makes arrest all the more likely, especially if AI can potentially search your phone without you knowing under the guise of “online safety”. I can envisage a time where simply being online and/or connected with telecoms in any way becomes a risky business – a bit like when Neo visits the Matrix. Watch out for Agent Smith! The new neo-liberals seem to have lost their sense of humour and don’t realise that telling a joke about something isn’t an indicator of hate, sexism, racism and any other ism – it's just banter and a vehicle for humour that doesn’t reveal a personality flaw. If someone can come back with a better retort or joke, then good on them!! Nobody needs to feel offended because no offense is intended. We are all responsible for our own feelings, and if someone gets offended where none is intended, they need to learn to recognise their own issue and deal with it.
Coming back to DI, at what point does the ETIAS morph into carrying papers like people did during WW2 for identification and rations etc? Are we really going to go back to that? If the lunatics continue to attack farming and food production whilst at the same time reducing sunlight for crop growth, we may well have to. Will children be required to have DI to go to school for example, or to go for medical treatment? Where does it stop? Without safeguards we can trust, the time and place it must be stopped is now, before what we have already extends into mandatory DI for every aspect of life. The logical step beyond that of course will be human microchipping….
The UN document talks about ensuring that digitalization maintains human rights and freedoms which is an admission/warning in itself that digitalization can be used to restrict them. If the UN, WHO and WEF were really concerned with individual rights and freedoms they wouldn't be hopping into bed with China who already have a social scoring system, and the Global Young Leaders programme would not have produced leaders such as Justin Trudeau, Jacinda Ardern and others who showed their complete totalitarian hands during recent COVID restrictions and lockdowns. The WHO wouldn’t be proposing the removal of individual rights considerations from the International Health Regulations via the amendments currently “under discussion” either.
Actions speak louder than words and many of the actions we are witnessing in preparation for Agenda 2030 give considerably more cause for concern than confidence. “By their fruits you shall know them” is how the Bible warns us.
The key word here is monitoring. Facial recognition has advanced sufficiently to identify people on partial facial information. In China there is a system called Skynet that does just this! The irony of the name won’t be lost on those familiar with the Terminator films. Given the attacks on the livelihoods of farmers in the Netherlands, Ireland and wherever else I can’t help but wonder if the farming monitoring mention would be more to do with stopping smallholders than anything else? The idea that drones would carry out the above activities better than a farmer in the field is pure fantasy. The fact that there are drones equipped with facial recognition that also carry 2g of Semtex for individual assassination shouldn’t be forgotten either. Who decides who the “bad” guys are?
By “novel vaccines” I assume they mean mRNA gene transfection technology despite all the evidence of the harms it does. There is no mention of anything else in terms of health and well-being which tells you all you need to know. When Pharma have been subject to some of the biggest fines for some of the biggest crimes in history, the idea that people can trust them and nothing else indicates how they plan to drive out those of us who dare to think and treat differently. When Pharma and the WHO were prepared to sacrifice pharmaceuticals such as ivermectin as they did during the COVID plandemic you can guarantee they won’t think twice about non-pharma products and modalities. There is evidence of this already as products such as serrapeptase have already been banned for sale for human use in the UK. Practitioners are being attacked for speaking out and whistleblowing on a variety of issues too. The ideal that we are moving towards a more diversity tolerant society is perverse. The truth is that hate is on the rise in the guise of tolerance.
Standardising education worldwide ensures only the historical narrative they want children to know will be taught. Who and/or what will be portrayed as villain or hero? History will be rewritten to justify whatever they want. We can already see what thinking and knowledge is replacing truth and decency. Education has been dumbed down and free-thinking and analysis discouraged. This has already been happening for years against scientists who dared speak out against the climate hoax, and more recently against the mainstream narrative in regard to COVID and the mRNA jabs etc. If they’re prepared to openly suppress these debates now, they will have no hesitation taking it further in future. Cancel culture needs to stop.
I find the singling out of women and girls rather strange considering there appears to be no official neo-liberal definition of either! Where has the UN, WHO and WEF been on the sexual exploitation and human trafficking that has been going on and is increasing massively? If you think we should trust the UN, WEF et al to sort out these world problems when they’ve done little to nothing to stop them, or at least with minimal impact if they have, you need to think again. On the wider picture, allowing those to sort out problems on whose watch they have arisen hasn’t got a history of being successful. Similarly, the idea that slavery is a black-only issue is rather undermined by this whole sordid industry that now rivals the illegal narcotics industry in size and revenue. Historically, all races and creeds have been victims and masters anyway which is rather conveniently forgotten by the neo-liberals who try to use historical oppression for their own agendas.
Clean water and sanitation could have been vastly improved decades ago if money directed into vaccines and other pharmaceutical interventions had been used to install clean water infrastructure and supplies throughout the developing world. The biggest improvements in health in the UK and other developed countries arose through providing clean water and yet such an essential practice seems to have been largely left to charities to raise money and initiate. There should be no need for water charities if the UN et al had allocated the proper and necessary funds.
When power stations are being closed down in the name of climate change to the point where a country such as Germany is losing its manufacturing industry and its people will go cold in anything other than a mild winter, the idea that electricity grids will be able to supply sufficient power for the IoT, electric cars and the rest of the technology described in this document is frankly laughable. Maybe the inability to deliver on all these threats to humanity because of this will be our saving grace?
I think many would dispute that internet availability and thus AI etc increases jobs. Indeed, the WEF have videos talking about how many human jobs will be replaced and how people will need to be re-educated to service the new digital world regardless of people’s abilities or desires. The UK government came under fire for an advertising campaign that portrayed a dancer having to be retrained do another job! They can’t have it all ways, but of course don’t want to be seen by the masses to be promoting policies and ideas that cause the loss of jobs. This reduction in employment is the reason why Universal Basic Income (UBI) is being trialled in Wales and now England.
I’m less concerned about AI in terms of where it could lead to as depicted by the Terminator films as I am by what it facilitates in terms of information control. Using the internet and plagiarism for homework has been ongoing in education for years already but is now hugely facilitated by AI such as Chat GPT. It enables those who control the data to ensure only the “correct” answer to a query is presented – similar to search suppression already introduced by Google and other search engines. Online information in opposition to whatever narrative can now be quickly found and potentially shut down as legislation such as the UK’s Online Safety Bill threatens to do. This will ensure that only the narrative and version of history, politics and whatever else they want to control peoples' knowledge about is available for learning.
No corner of the earth can be left unmonitored where dissent might arise. I’ve written extensively on the damage by EMFs to people, animals, and plants. Nobody knows what the implications are for the huge number of satellites on the ionosphere and magnetosphere that we rely on to deflect solar radiation around us. Our saving grace for this might once more be the inability to generate sufficient electricity to power everything they like to think will be developed into SMART technology etc.
When my car can’t reliably connect to my mobile phone 100% of the time, I think they over-estimate what is going to be possible, at least in the near term!! We can draw solace from that however frustrating it is at the time when my car technology won’t play ball!
Much of this is covered in other sections which shows they just like this one for the title and perception it projects. We know in reality that’s all it is and doesn’t extend to the elite sharing their vast wealth and control that is being ever concentrated in smaller numbers.
Notice how there is no mention of anything other than urban areas. This was clearly written with their 15 minute cities in mind which of course would make surveillance and control that much easier if we weren’t spread out in the countryside too. If they were genuinely interested in sustainability etc as they define it they would already be voluntarily stopping their use of private jets, going to Davos and Summits in favour of online meetings etc…
No doubt 3D printing has some great uses, but it isn’t appropriate for everything including meat production. Everything else stinks of monitoring and control and is dealt with elsewhere.
How going digital can reduce the lithium mining and associated destruction of the environment and the consumption of other natural resources that will be required in much higher amounts by the provision of everything else they promise indicates how deluded they are and how false this document really is. Of course, the maintenance of the CO2 hoax is more than enough evidence of this already. As said on many occasions in the past it’s just the justification for suppressing the masses and shifting our wealth to the elite. The dishonesty and suppression of the truth represented by this alone indicates the true intention of the UN et al.
The idea that satellites can track all the plastic in the seas is simply laughable. When so much plastic that was supposed to go for recycling has ended up dumped on foreign shores in huge amounts and nothing has been done about it, the idea that somehow using a digital tracking system for plastic will cure all plastic ills is pie in the sky!
More surveillance promises to monitor and control individuals under the guise of climate.
History tells us the increased centralisation increases power and corruption hand in hand. When there are blatant plans to suppress freedom of speech, freedom of journalism and arrest of individuals for speaking out against the narrative the idea that justice will prevail is based purely on their perception of these things. Inability to speak out may be peaceful from their point of view but it isn’t peace. Promotion of wars such as is ongoing in Ukraine is all the evidence we need to see how the exact opposite of everything this “sustainable development” really stands for.
Proof, if ever more were needed, that the control of Government by big industry now overrides the freedoms and democracy of the people that Government are supposed to represent.
Summary
This UN document provides yet further evidence of how those who currently hold power wish to extend it and control the narrative and people. The positive takeaway is that I don't think the technology is as capable and failsafe as they'd like to think to the point where it probably can't be quite as all-controlling as they'd like, nit that it wouldn't be sufficient to create all sorts of problems for those of us who will refuse to lie down and roll over.
We can but hope that the failure to be able to deliver on what they'd like for us in totality will leave sufficient chinks in the armour for when the currently subserviant masses who don't appear to give 2 figs for their own future and those of their descendents might actually wake up and take umbrage at being controlled beyond the point where even they are willing to tolerate.
