Nearly everything that has been developed has the ability to be used for dual purpose. By that I mean good and evil. Those who know me through my work will know that I keep at the cutting edge of technology that can be used to help people and animals heal themselves such Scenar, Bioresonance and more. I'm no Luddite! Through my use of frequency devices to aid healing I am very much aware that just as good frequencies can induce healing, so the “wrong” ones, or over/under exposure can potentially cause harm.
A prime example is the recent ruling in the USA against the FCC for failing to adequately ensure EMFs are safe prior to ubiquitous mast deployment. It is ground-breaking to rule against Telecoms who are the biggest lobby group in the world, yet is seemingly failing to engage the brakes on the roll-out of terrestrial 5G, nor the crazy deployment of many thousands of 5G satellites with no idea what impact beaming megawatts of microwaves from space will have on our ionosphere, magnetosphere, weather and Schumann Resonance, magnetic fields and whatever else you care to name, given that there is nothing that isn’t made of 16 waves, fields and particles that materialise and dematerialise in ways we cannot fathom at the Quantum level.
Those who work in these fields are very much aware of this duality of purpose. We should therefore take note when somebody who is as much at the cutting edge of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as Elon Musk is warning about its potential dangers. He considers AI to be a much more potential threat to humanity than nuclear weapons. To be fair to him, he has been calling for proper regulation of the AI industry for quite a few years. Here is his latest warning…
You might wonder why he continues to work in this field if he fears what it can achieve so much. Clearly, he recognises the benefits, but fears the ability for negative impacts that duality brings. If asked, I daresay he’d give the same answer used by those who have mapped the mind and gone on on to work out how to read our thoughts when we are asleep and how to seed thoughts in our brain so we cannot distinguish these from those our brain brings into consciousness of its own volition. Work in these fields is justified on the basis that if we don’t do it then others will (others meaning our “enemies”) and we need to know what can be done in order to try to work out how to counter it. It’s a difficult conclusion to argue with because there is some obvious sense in it, and yet we also know that scientists frequently don’t know when to stop, and continue pushing back the boundaries beyond where ethics says mankind should stop. China encourages scientists there in this way as a prime example of a power we do not want to have such technology and ability. In reality they wouldn't be likely to take heed of regulations either, which creates it's own issue.
As worrying as the lack of regulation is the arrogance that often accompanies such intelligence of the developers to think that all angles have been thought of and covered. By definition, the idea that to err is human has profound consequences. The whole point of AI is that the machines learn from their mistakes and don’t repeat them. AI learning is exponential and potentially at a rate we cannot comprehend given how fast quantum computers can now work. In comparison, humans frequently don’t learn on the whole, or at least incredibly slowly for some, as demonstrated by the current situation where we’re heading full steam towards totalitarianism with the majority seemingly unable to see it despite current Governments repeating the preparations of past regimes.
Google had to close down a past AI program because the AI computers started to develop their own language that the developers couldn’t understand and they feared that it was potentially heading towards a Skynet scenario from the Terminator films where AI decided humans were the problem and set about wiping out the human race. On the basis of what AI means about learning from their mistakes, do you think a future AI system would repeat that same mistake?!
So there is a dilemma. How to develop and use AI for good whilst protecting the human race from further mass extinction? The film Robocop of course has the answer!! Software programming must have as a central core in every algorithm, that any solution resulting in death of humans is automatically discarded. I would also suggest that Elon Musk’s warning must be heeded and regulations established asap, determined by those within the industry who, like Elon Musk recognise the dangers and know enough about AI to know where and how limitations must be introduced.
Meanwhile Elon Musk continues to develop his AI technology and robotics. He has revealed his robots of the future within which he has built in limitations to size and speed so that a rogue robot cannot keep up with a human running away and is supposedly small enough to be overpowered. The obvious possibility this raises is the ability to produce the exact opposite for military purposes – too fast, too strong and too good a shot… Another great film Ex Machina is a warning that higher intelligence has the potential to out-think even the greatest human minds.
The other SciFi film that then springs to mind is I, Robot with Will Smith as a cop who investigates a crime by a robot that isn’t supposed to be able to happen. Straight away we are back in that place where technology is developed by the “good” guys to try to stay one step ahead of the “bad” guys.
This begs the question who are the “good” guys and who are the “bad” guys and who decides who is good or bad?
Consider the following ...
In the current Plandemic situation, the lunatics are running the asylum. The jabs convey no real benefit on those who receive them because the jabbed/unjabbed can all be infected to equal degrees and all can pass infection on. It makes COVID Passports purely a political tool for discrimination that are entirely divisive in setting people against each other, and thus facilitate in bringing in Totalitarian legislation. There is minimal, if any, real protection against infection because whilst there may be some reduction in symptoms (for a very limited time) from the variant against which the individual has had antibodies induced, the fact remains that the spike proteins are dangerous. The genetic coding can be reversed into the recipient’s DNA with medium/long term adverse consequences I’ve covered in past blogs, and immune priming (ADE) seems to be relatively common judging from the number of jabbed people going down with symptoms (with a significant number dying) that the Government are blaming on the Delta variant. Children are having significant levels of VAERS too. In the complete opposite direction to logic and common sense, the solutions being promoted are to jab more people and increase testing on children, whilst increasing restrictions on the sensible unjabbed people, who are perfectly able to cope with natural infection because, shock horror, we HAVE A FULLY FUNCTIONAL IMMUNE SYSTEM – who’d a thought it?!!!
What if the Government solution for the current situation was to decide that the unjabbed are the “bad” guys and deployed the following “solution”?
Thankfully, this isn’t a practical solution now. There are too many unjabbed people, so it would be too expensive, and it’s too early in the birth of the future Totalitarian regime to get away with it. Too many people would wake up far too fast. However, this is a good example of why regulation of AI needs to be put in place yesterday. When the population is significantly smaller post ADE/Prion die off, and those who are awake and resistant to authoritarian control are left, such measures become potentially more plausible in future. It is exactly because of such future possibilities that we need to be aware and legislate NOW.
Of course, for such a drone solution to be feasible it requires people to be easily individually identifiable. There are too many people with the same name (even mine!), and family resemblances too great that could enable the wrong target to be taken out.
There are no prizes for guessing that the intended solution for this problem is Digital Identity. COVID Passports aren’t the intended end in themselves – that’s far too limited an application. As I explained in my blog Slowly, slowly catchy monkey this is just an example of a small step that people have been brainwashed to accept through their installed fear of COVID. It is the start of the slippery slope towards the full Digital ID2020 agenda that the G20 met and endorsed earlier this month.
The word cautious has been inserted to indicate they recognise the obvious threat, and to try to head off the warnings from those of us who are calling it out for what it is. Don’t for one minute think that such monitoring and tracking ability with infinite data mining capability has no intention of being used to its full extent as predicted by Yuval Noah Harari at Davos.
A blog wouldn’t be complete at the moment without a warning about Klaus Schwab and the WEF. Back in 2016, Schwab was predicting transhumanism and the implant of microchips within a decade.
So don’t call me a Conspiracy Theorist when it’s all been declared and there is even a UK Government webpage on “Human augmentation” albeit with regards to military applications, but don’t tell me it wouldn’t be deployed amongst us like Robocop too.
Elon Musk and others are already developing brain implants, with trials due to start within the next couple of years. As I’ve previously said, implants aren’t even needed when minds can be read, and thoughts can seeded just based on individual frequency. In the same way, radionics can send healing to an individual too. It's just another example of duality.
This also seems to be Schwab’s solution to stopping AI get out of control – integrate AI into humans. The result would be that pure humans become slaves, and then extinct when the human/AI hybrids go out of control because the AI robotic part of the humanoid cyborg takes control of the human mind and body. It’s too far-fetched for even a Bond film, yet it’s all part of the WEF’s future plans. I would say "future plans for humanity", but once we go down the road where AI starts controlling our thoughts, then where is humanity? Where is spirituality? Where is our freedom to choose and express who we are as individuals? It's all another aspect of Wokeness, which is the illusory act of trying to make every individual the same by fitting everyone into every pigeonhole, instead of celebrating and recognising our differences.
Joe Biden has already suggested the idea that pre-crime predictive arrests as highlighted in the film Minority Report would be possible in future. It’s scary stuff. He's unlikely to last long now after his deliberate Afghanistan stunt that makes way for Kamala Harris as always intended. The truth about how the Democrats stole the 2020 election seems to finally coming out more too, which is an indication that the current agenda is starting to fail.
I always like to end on a positive, and we can take some comfort from the recent report on near misses with satellites!!
There are only a fraction of the intended number already launched that are required to provide the bandwidth needed to monitor and control everybody. With Space-X intending to ultimately have 43,000 (rather more than the 12,000 reported in the article), matched by UK’s OneWeb, that BoJo rescued with £500m of taxpayers’ money during the first lockdown, matched by a European consortium, not to mention military satellites and those from China and Russia, and God knows where else, the crashes (and outages from them) must surely be an obstacle to providing such blanket surveillance. We can but hope, although the EMFs this number of satellites will generate brings increasing dangers in the meantime too. Thankfully CMO technology can mitigate for this.
We can but hope that people will wake up to the current Plandemic over COVID, and in doing so see the bigger picture that is in plain sight. There is still time for a halt to be called, and there are encouraging signs that the world domination plan is faltering despite desperate Government measures in certain countries to try to ramp up the control and force through the required legislation in double-quick time. Denmark has revoked all COVID restrictions and measures and has declared SARS-CoV2 to be an endemic disease. Keep visualising that other countries will follow suit, and the evil plan to establish Schwab’s Great Reset cannot succeed.
Although it doesn’t necessarily feel like it at times with some of what we are seeing around the World, WE ARE WINNING.