It must end
Although only 2 words, the phrase “cancel culture” has 2 meanings, both of which it seems to me apply to the current world situation and trends. On one hand it means that there is an emerging culture of cancelling things, such as those that aren’t deemed politically correct, including history that might teach us to avoid repeating mistakes, or the expression of opinions or established inoffensive phrases that might now suddenly be found “offensive” by some delicate snowflake somewhere in a far flung corner. On the other hand, it is the literal cancellation of culture itself, although I think things are now going beyond even this to the point of where the transhumanists are trying to cancel what it is to be human at all. This wokeness and corruption of decency must end now, or else it will only get worse. What better time to end it than when 2022 slips away, and to return to noble endeavours as we welcome in 2023?
There was a time not that long ago where the pursuit of science was a noble endeavour. It was the attempt to understand the world around us so that whatever truth was revealed could be applied to further humanity in the widest sense. I’m not so naïve as to think that money has never corrupted this goal, because clearly it has, and for many decades, but even within a certain paradigm of thinking and working, the majority of those at the coalface worked to a certain level of ethics and truth. For example, I truly believe that many working in mainstream medicine have done so with the genuine intention of trying to help their fellow man. I use this term in its proper unwoke meaning that encompasses both genders, because there are only 2 of those too. In some situations, such as in acute emergencies in particular, mainstream medicine can be incredibly successful, but far less so in many other areas such as chronic disease. Whilst nobody would expect people or businesses to work for nothing, there is I believe, a universal gnosis – a knowing of what is right and wrong, and ethical in all things, including what might be considered a fair valuation of a benefit received.
Somewhere along the line this gnosis has been suppressed to the point where only through corruption can we have arrived at where we are today. Money itself is not the root of all evil – much good can be done with money – but the desire and pursuit of money for the sake of just accumulating ever more and abusing the influence and power that often comes with huge wealth seem to have become legitimate ends in themselves. The arrogance to think that just because a person has become vastly wealthy in one field, that he/she somehow then knows what’s best for us all in every area of our lives within totally different circumstances, is totally out of control and threatens our very existence by its stupidity.
The following scientific research paper in which both mRNA COVID jabs seem to be hailed for increasing lasting immunity (as indicated by raised IgG levels) appears upon superficial reading and understanding to be a “good thing”. The Moderna jab supposedly out-performs the Pfizer one, both of which are seemingly significantly better than the J&J non-replicating viral vector jab. In this paper, IgG is used as a marker for immunity and how long it lasts by a group of scientists who you would expect to be very familiar with IgG, and understand very well the implications of their findings.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978955/
However, if you read the following explanation of IgG we discover that there are 4 sub-groups of IgG, imaginatively called IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4!
It turns out that the different sub-groups of IgG have different roles, and that in the case of infection by SARS-CoV2, having increased levels of IgG4 (achieved through 3+ jabs) may not necessarily be a good thing, and the main benefits of IgG as a whole are conferred by the IgG3 sub-group, and to a lesser extent the IgG1. Over-stimulation and production of IgG4 isn’t good at all. In short, excessive Spike Protein (SP) exposure from a combination of jabs and breakthrough infections leads to immune tolerance. This means that the immune system increases production of the anti-inflammatory IgG4 antibodies in response to the SP. IgG4 tags the SP thereby indicating to your immune system not to worry about it! In parallel, it suppresses IgG3 production, which is 50 times better at neutralising the SP, and is therefore the most important response. No wonder those who have had 3+ jabs are prone to repeat COVID infections which will only make the situation worse.
The other issue with suppressing IgG3 and increasing IgG4 is that there will be amino acid sequences common to other respiratory viruses so that this disadvantageous response is extended to them too.
If you’re ahead of me, you will already have realised that measuring IgG without breaking down the sub-group production figures as they did in the research paper to put a positive spin on the mRNA jabs, is totally meaningless from a scientific/medical perspective, but totally supports the political agenda being pushed by the WHO globalists and WEF-serving Governments to increase mRNA “vaccine” usage for all sorts of other diseases whether declared as a Pandemic, or to replace existing traditional true vaccines with their mRNA counterpart. Don’t forget the 500 vaccination program target globally. This does not mean everyone is supposed to receive 500 different types as vaccine as some are interpreting this to mean, but clearly indicates there are many more planned than currently available, as well as expanding the 167 current programs into new countries too.
The declared intent to massively increase and widen what we vaccinate for is yet another aspect of our cancel culture. Nobody is allowed to get ill anymore, and whilst I absolutely believe that prevention is better than cure, it has to be done in a way that recognises how our body truly functions and to work with it. Our immune system primarily functions and strengthens through continuous interaction with the biome around and inside us, including diseases that we often meet and survive as children. Some childhood diseases are considered to prime the immune system ready for later life, including to help prevent cancer, so to experience these are clearly beneficial in the bigger picture. Good hygiene and good quality food are what really reduced the incidence and severity of these diseases, and not vaccines as we’ve been told to believe.
Presenting an antigen (something that stimulates an immune response) via a vaccine route that the body would never naturally encounter a disease and thereby stimulating elements of an immune response that would never naturally be stimulated, and using other chemicals (adjuvants) to enhance this response is always likely to risk complications and adverse effects. Nobody has EVER caught a natural respiratory infection via their deltoid shoulder muscle!! There is a different branch of the immune system in your deltoid compared with the mucosa of your nose or lungs. Pharma has yet to better the immune response and protection our body will naturally produce from successfully surviving a disease. As the book, Turtles all the Way Down explains, adverse reactions and poor scientific methodology is the only way the current list of vaccinations successfully made it to market. The number of adverse reactions is the sole reason for vaccine companies being granted immunity from prosecution; and the danger of vaccines is the sole reason the companies require it!
Coming back to the obfuscating research paper, it begs the question as to why publish it. The lead scientists MUST understand the role and function of the 4 IgG subgroups, if only to know how to perform their research in order to achieve the desired results. They must have known not to break the IgG measurements into their subgroup statistics in order to reach the required conclusions. You would think the peer-reviewers would have a better understanding too. I'm sure they all do too, but failed for whatever reason(s) to point out the weakness of the presented science.
It is clear from various bits of legislation and announcements around the World that there is an intended agenda for mRNA technology in itself. Despite the fact that prior to the COVID jabs all mRNA preparations failed to make it to market due to safety concerns, and despite all the adverse reactions reported for the COVID jabs that exceed all other vaccination adverse reactions to all other vaccines to date, mRNA jabs are still being promoted as "safe and efficacious" to the point where the plan is for new mRNA jabs against future “pandemics” to be rolled out within 100 days of a plandemic being announced. Either the stupidity is simply mind-boggling, or there is a much more nefarious agenda. It seems to me that the “stupidity” is being rolled out far too cleverly for it to just be stupidity, and that therefore it must evidence a far more sinister depopulation agenda.
One thing that I should point out here is that the immediate adverse reactions to the mRNA jabs could not have been caused by SP production and antibody production against them which is the modus operandi is for these gene therapies. That takes time to initiate. So what causes the fast adverse reactions that in some cases happens in just minutes? The mRNA in the jabs has to AVOID the immune system (which is why they aren’t proper vaccines) so they are enclosed within the PEG lipid nanoparticles which must therefore be responsible for the immediate adverse reactions. It is already known that a significant proportion of the population are sensitive to PEG which is why some scientists were warning right from the start against using it. Given that people can clearly be sensitised to it, repeated use of PEG lipid nanoparticles in mRNA jabs of all variations whether against COVID, flu or other pathogens will only heighten this sensitivity in already susceptible individuals, and will increase the number of people who are sensitised to it. The idea that in future, mRNA jabs can replace all traditional jabs and be brought to market in 100 days for future plandemics is fanciful at best, and ignores the consequences of such repeated exposure to PEG, especially given that the jabs seem to have dubious efficacy (if any) for only 3 months and so require frequent “boosters”.
Nevertheless, the UK Government has just signed a 10 year deal with Moderna for up to 250m doses per year. Assuming deagel.com’s prediction for the UK population to fall to 14m by 2025 is totally wrong, and the UK averages 65m people, that is still about 4 doses per person of just Moderna jabs! That isn’t counting Pfizer, Merck or any of the other “vaccine” manufacturers. As Dr John Campbell asks in the following video on YouTube, why is the UK Government contractually committing to spending such huge sums of tax-payers’ money for such an experimental class of Pharma with a company with no real past history other than 2 COVID jabs, both of which are proving to be more harmful than useful?
Notice how the size of the deal is referred to in terms of numbers of doses, rather than a monetary amount. If a Moderna jab costs anything like the Pfizer one (c. $130 ea) then you’re looking at 100 times this dose figure in terms of money - ie £billions. Where do you think this money is coming from? Answer: taxes – ie Joe Public. This one contract with Moderna represents a significant share of the annual NHS budget for everything, at a time when all other treatments have a considerable backlog of cases that got worse over lockdowns etc, some of which have significantly increased as a direct consequence of the jabs – eg cancer, auto-immune diseases etc.
If the medium and long term adverse effects of the COVID jabs start kicking in even more as you’d expect them to, and all cause excess deaths continue to rise, then who of the survivors will even want an mRNA jab in the first place, let alone multiple jabs?!! Beware measures brought in to reduce “vaccine hesitancy” in those who have bothered to do our own research. This is already being openly discussed and we are being labelled in derogatory terms in advance of the introduction of measures to criminalise us in much the same way that Jews were attacked in the early 1930s Nazi Germany.
If you’re wondering why the UK Government chose Moderna to sign the deal with then it isn’t hidden very deeply at all. As Dr Campbell points out in his video, Rishi Sunak was a founding partner with Theleme Partners LLP who are a significant investor in Moderna. Although Sunak left managing the US Office through which he must have had close dealings with Moderna, and stopped working within the company itself, it is highly likely that he and/or his wife retained a significant shareholding, although we don’t know that for sure because Theleme Partner LLP is registered in the Cayman Islands; well known as a tax haven with no transparency. Quite frankly the whole deal stinks, but then little doesn’t in Westminster these days. When you consider that the mRNA jabs have been shown to significantly adversely impact the immune system, it makes the deal even worse. The other factor of course is that a certain Bill Gates invested heavily in Moderna too, and has also “donated” money to the UK Government, no doubt to ensure his investments are well looked after. Who else within the UK Government and medical authorities stand to gain I wonder?
If you’re thinking that with all the questioning going on now by Andrew Bridgen MP over jab injuries, and more Drs who have stepped up to the plate following his parliamentary speech and debate, that the narrative is coming to an end, then unfortunately the signs are not as encouraging as we'd like. Following the change to their past zero-COVID policy, it is no surprise that China is in the throes of a big COVID outbreak, which has led to other Governments around the world to require precautionary measures for Chinese visitors. On the face of it, this seems reasonable until you delve into the infection fatality rate (IFR) and discover it is just 0.000207%. So, whilst it might be very infectious and be spreading rapidly in China, it clearly isn’t anything particularly worth worrying about any more than any other respiratory viruses that are circulating at this time of year as normal … unless you’ve been stupid enough to get 3+ jabs and your IgG4 is interfering with your normal immune response so you aren't fighting anything that effectively any more….
Bear in mind too that Chinese citizens were forced to be vaccinated with the Chinese variation of a COVID vaccine, so the figures are representative of the effects of a break-out variant on an immune-tampered public, although we don’t have the same immunity data regarding responses to the Chinese jabs to the same degree we have about those jabs used here. What we do know however, is that coronavirus vaccine attempts in the past produced antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) which is why the original SARS vaccine never made it to market. Consequently, I don't think it’s an unreasonable assumption to consider that Chinese citizens’ immune systems are somewhat compromised to varying degrees, such that future outbreaks there may see even more deaths and a falsely high IFR (compared with the IFR in unjabbed people) as the ADE response becomes more widespread with increasing exposures. This scenario could be what the WHO are waiting for once they have got all countries to sign up to the CA+ pandemic treaty rehash that opens the doors to their globalist totalitarian take-over. As my last blog on WHO Fascism warned, they could declare a worldwide Pandemic for any "health" reason based on something happening thousands of miles away, and if the UK Government has signed up to whatever CA+ ends up being called, we'd be controlled by what the WHO globalists decree.
This over-reaction by Governments towards a virus that is in reality no more dangerous than any other normal respiratory virus, is an indication that the various authorities around the world have no intention of learning from their mistakes (being generous) made during 2020 and onwards. Their action is designed to maintain the fear, and with it the justification for continuing the narrative and loss of freedoms etc that secure their higher degree of control.
Ivor Cummins has done a useful comparison between the Sept 2019 Event 201 dry run for COVID and the recent dry run for the 2025 SEERS plandemic. The WHO video is clearly all about justifying “pandemic preparedness” at huge expense, and pre-programming those African nations who rejected the old Pandemic Treaty into accepting the new CA+ version. They are also laying the plans for the future declaration, which as we've discovered this time, doesn't necessarily need to meet the threats the modellers have been told to model provided it is sufficient to grab global control and mandate whatever they wish. This is the vulnerability that comes with Governments signing up to "pandemic preparedness" with the WHO. As with the Monkeypox "pandemic" Tedros unilaterally declared it despite it being voted against by the majority of those who were supposed to take the decision! The only way to safeguard us is to get out of the WHO, so that anything they declare and decree does not apply to us.
The wokeness and everything else that is going on in the name of climate change and whatever else justifies the agenda, is all about tearing down the structure and moral fibre of society that has rejected such totalitarianism in the past. They need to weaken the resistance of decent thinking people, and as ex-KGB spy Yuri Bezmenov explained in 1984 (ironically) it only takes a stolen snowflake population through woke and dumbed down education to enable the takeover, plus the usual human psychology that younger generations generally think they know better. Judging by the wave of woke stupidity that is the true pandemic, the dumbing down of childrens' education has successfully stolen the generation that are now becoming the new young decision-makers at national and international level, led by those who received their final brain-washing as part of the WEF Young Global Leaders cult.
Yuval Noah Harari (chief advisor to Klaus Schwab and his WEF) is no stranger with regards to his inclusion in my blogs and posts in the past for his promotion of transhumanism and the whole WEF technocracy. In the following video he sets out how humanity will be deconstructed so that people will live in permanent fear of reprisals, and can never truly let their hair down, unless for some deviant activity they were groomed to perform in their 5 year old sex education class.
According to him, something you did/said 20+ years ago could affect your current job application. He clearly has no knowledge of what a sense of humour is. Jokes do not necessarily indicate how someone may feel or act in an everyday non-humorous situation. If I tell a joke about an Essex girl or blondes, it does not mean I think all Essex girls or blondes are stupid. It doesn’t mean I’m sexist either. It’s just a joke. It’s a vehicle for relaying a funny story or play on words. That’s all. Every culture has it’s own version of a subset or foreign nation who feature in jokes simply to relay the funny story. No offence is intended, and none should be taken in that situation, and that’s what should be taught because laughter is a great medicine, and it seems we’re being discouraged from even having that.
Likewise, Harari seems to forget that we were all young once, and all made mistakes and behaved in ways, or said things that we’re not proud of in our past. That’s how we learn – from our mistakes, not wanting to repeat our shame or embarrassment. Our past misdemeanours don’t necessarily make us a fundamentally bad person now provided we've learned from our mistakes, and hopefully we are all the wiser and better for them. Nobody is perfect, so to hold something against us as mature adults for something that happened, and that everyone may have forgotten about, and/or that we may well regret in our past, shows the level of dehumanisation, control and fear they intend to hold over us like a sword of Damocles. Such experiences are universal and nobody is innocent, which again indicates their intention to have one rule for them and another for us. It also indicates the lengths they expect to go to with data mining and how long they intend to store such data for. Whatever happened to GDRP data limitations for personal data storage of no longer than 6 months, or will that only apply to the elite in future?!! Is that part of what they would add to a Digital Identity for anyone to read?
Who wants to live in a dehumanised and fearful world like that? If you don’t, now would be a good time with the start of 2023 to stand up and be counted… Let’s make 2023 the year the worm really turned. It only actually takes 2% of the population to stand up and change the world direction, so let's do it and keep the faith. If Harari is to be believed, then any past data, posts etc in existence means we’re all pretty much toast already anyway (especially me for my posts and blogs!), so what have you got to lose?!!
Happy New Year!! Onwards and upwards...
