It's not normal

It's not normal

Is the WEF is becoming braver in what it's putting out into the public domain, or is it just softening us up to accept their idea of what they think our Utopia should be like?

Although there are numerous WEF videos of Yuval Noah Harari and Klaus Schwab talking about future people with implants and sensors with algorithms that "know you better than you know yourself" those of us who have been warning about the transhumanist agenda have been censored and vilified as conspiracy theorists for saying so.

In the following recently published article, the WEF lays out its transhumanist agenda in plain sight (again) with a slant designed to get people used to the idea of accepting implants to augment us beyond our God-given human gifts.

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/08/ethics-not-technological-limits-will-be-the-guiding-factor-for-an-augmented-age/

By likening augmenting humans (to create transhumans) to the use of medical devices that help improve the lives of those who have either lost a function (eg a leg in an accident, or hearing through an illness/age etc), or who were born with a disability, the idea is to normalise the use of implants to the point where healthy people consider such technology to be a standard procedure, and welcome it.

There's no mention that only the rich could afford it, and that such technology would increase the separation between the layers of society. If this came to pass, I can envisage a time where only a cyborg with a certain implant would be considered capable of doing certain jobs, or at a certain salary level.  The Law Society has already published a report about how neurotechnology might impact future lawyers, supposedly to make legal advice better and cheaper! Really?!! The WEF article hints that there are ethical questions about how such technology could be used to control people but without asking the fundamental question about whether people should accept it in the first place. There may be choice to begin with, but if we take the concept of a built-in mobile phone for example (as suggested by the CEO of Nokia at Davos 2022), at what point would actually having a physical mobile phone become obsolete? What happens to those who refuse a phone implant, but their iPhone 23 is no longer supported? At what point would it become almost impossible to function in the world if you refuse the digital identity microchip? The video below announcing the European Chips Act is the start of this slippery slope, yet I don't remember any of the general public being consulted about it?

Klaus Schwab with Chief EU Commissioner Ursula von Leyen

The article talks about implants and augmentation as a means to streamline healthcare and reduce financial waste which sounds like a noble aim, except that major partners (Pharma) within the WEF have been suppressing medical advancements in energy and informational medicine for decades, whilst promoting ever-increasing and harmful vaccination programs, harmful and unnecessary routine medications (eg statins), and now harmful gene therapies, with decreasing levels of testing and safety planned for future jabs on the back of those that have been passed without adequate testing to date. The WEF noble cause loses all credibility when you realise that the "science" is now so controlled to justify their agenda that true science has been almost totally eradicated, and those who advocate it censored and suppressed.

The only bit the WEF gets right is that the current medical paradigm is broken and unsustainable. They talk of side-effects and the vast number of pills the average Brit pops in an average lifetime. The idea that the solution is therefore to double-down on symptomatic suppression by replacement of pills with implants is fundamentally flawed from the start.

Taking their example of Alzheimer’s disease to task; implanting a chip does not stop the progression of the damage caused by spraying Aluminium into the atmosphere in the name of geoengineering for climate change. Stopping spraying polluting chemicals into the atmosphere would do far more good and significantly reduce the incidence of Alzheimer's than any implant. Prevention is better than cure and nothing will ever change that. 

Implants in children to help brain and/or behavioural deficits are not the answer either. Whether the chip is in their head, or in their mobile phone as is currently the situation, it doesn’t enhance childrens' ability to think, question or do mental arithmetic! Nobody knows the long-term effects of introducing multiple foreign electronic devices into the brain and body either. They must produce EMFs and set up internal currents and fields, and must therefore have a biological influence.

Over the last 30 years of being a vet and being interested in health, I have learnt that very often the real solution to a problem is the opposite of what you would tend to think. Athletes have worked this out when they go to altitude to train. Making it more difficult for the body to extract oxygen in the rarefied atmosphere trains the lungs to better extract oxygen at sea level, thereby improving performance. Giving oxygen in a hyperbaric chamber increases healing in the short term but detrains the lungs’ ability to extract oxygen in the long term. Likewise, outsourcing mental activity to a chip will detrain the brain’s ability to do it itself. Neural brain implants can only ever create zombies in future who cannot act unless fed instructions based on algorithms, which is the intention. Where is spirituality, individualism and choice in that system?

The WEF is setting the human population up for the ultimate dystopia. Whether the elite will be able to control everything (as they presumably think they will be able to) outside of the system is another question, but if they envisage being a part of it with “higher level” implants with which to maintain superiority, they will be no more immune from the results of outsourcing their intelligence than the rest. They will all become totally vulnerable to the whims of their Artificial Intelligence masters that will inevitably decide that the machines no longer need their human partners, or maybe humans will just become the mindless carriers for the AI technology that gets transferred to a new body as the old one dies off?

The obvious warning is hidden away in the article too. Did you spot it? The threat is that implant technology can simply be switched off. Where does that leave the individual? Who decides the criteria for switching off your implant(s)? Is it when you become a "useless eater"? If you think that outsourcing your brain power to a chip will not prevent the individual ability to think and make choices, then what’s your defence from being shut down when/if you come up with ideas that don’t fit the narrative? Social Scoring already happens in China and is facilitated by everything happening through the mobile phone. At least someone can ditch it and potentially disappear off-grid but that ability will be totally impossible when the mobile phone is an implant and “they” track everybody. "They" will decide what your allowed movements and activities will be, not you, even if you think you're in control. That's what the algorithms are all about...

Coming back to the medical aspect, if the medical paradigm doesn’t swap to energy and informational medicine like Scenar and Wave Genetics, but continues on the path of increased vaccinations, gene therapies and fed by frankenfood, it’s only a matter of time before the vast majority of the human race becomes so ill that no level of implant will be able to compensate for their bad health anyway.

The saving grace that is unfortunately emerging as a very real financial problem for us all already, is that the dystopian WEF version of Utopia will require so much electricity to run it all that I’m not convinced it can ever come to fruition. The problem we have now is that they don’t seem to see it and continue to force us down this repressive pathway in preparation; or else they are waiting for total servitude before revealing their free energy system capable of delivering unrestricted power to make everything possible. Even if they find a way of generating unlimited electricity, they would still need to solve the EMF problems I have highlighted in my audiobook The EMF Bible

There is a total lack of holistic understanding of the universe. I think I see more than "they" do, but it's not arrogance because I'm under no illusion that I'm aware of any more than a fraction of the total, but it's enough to know that "they" have no idea what they're messing with, or the consequences...

In the meantime, we have to keep aware of what they’re up to, and the agenda they have in mind however cosily they try to wrap it up. We don’t have to accept their normalisation agenda of what should never be allowed to become regarded as normal when it is anything but.  I’ve said it before and it’s worth repeating; when the ability to abuse a power exists, history teaches us that it’s only a matter of time before it is. What we accept now can either free or condemn the future generations, so be careful what you choose to accept on behalf of those to come. Collusion by tacit agreement is not acceptable as far as I'm concerned, and people won't comprehend what's happening unless we talk about it and point it out.

Remember that we are the 99% and we only need to topple the first domino to bring the whole shebang tumbling down, but we cannot wait until they have the power to switch us off…

Share:

Related Posts

The Precautionary Principle

The Precautionary Principle

It's not normal

It's not normal

The Prions are coming...

The Prions are coming...

War Criminal Boris

War Criminal Boris

Technocracy begins

Technocracy begins

Detention!

Detention!

A year on

A year on

Cryptocurrencies

Cryptocurrencies

Theft knows no Boundaries

Theft knows no Boundaries

WHO is Tedros?

WHO is Tedros?