Jib-Jab Repercussions

What is the risk from the jabbed?

Jib-Jab Repercussions

There is a lot of discussion online regarding the repercussions of having been jabbed with the so-called “COVID vaccinations”. In this blog I will give a simplified description of the immune system which is actually so very much more complicated that it isn’t fully understood yet. Most people have no concept as to how complicated it is, and thus have little to no understanding of how these jabs screw it up and hasten your demise in a number of possible ways.

My hope is that if you better understand how the immune system works, and the difference in immune response with natural v artificial infection, then you will see the folly in being jabbed and at least save the children.

I have put “COVID vaccinations” in quotation marks because just using that name itself shows a level of significant misunderstanding. COVID is the full-blown disease that requires people to be hospitalised. Getting a mild SARS-CoV2 infection, which is what the vast majority of people experienced under 80 years old, is NOT COVID. People who weren’t hospitalised had one of the many thousands of natural mutations of SARS-CoV2 virus and recovered, and were never really in danger. The original SARS-CoV2 probably doesn’t even exist any more.  Secondly, these jabs are NOT vaccinations which has a precise definition and modus operandi that involves DIRECT stimulation of the immune system with an antigen. An antigen can be any part of the pathogen that an immune response to will cause the destruction of that pathogen by your immune system. I don’t care if the definition of the word vaccine has been changed to allow these new gene therapies to be called “vaccines”. They weren’t, aren’t and never will be vaccines. It’s purely a political/financial convenience so that you can’t claim compensation when you’re damaged by them.

Different levels of immune response

Local: The immune system is organised into different levels of immune response. For respiratory viruses there is local immunity within the mucous membranes that lines all of our respiratory system – nostrils and sinuses, right down to our lungs.  If local immunity can successfully repel attack then the systemic immunity doesn’t have to kick in.  Breathing freely without masks is essential to maintain our local respiratory immunity.

Specificity: There are also different levels of specificity within the immune system. There are some immune responses that are non-specific – they recognise non-self and attack it, whatever it is. This is the first line of specificity which starts the battle against a pathogen whilst the more specific immune response first learns what it’s dealing with and then gets the body to develop and amplify production of antibodies to certain aspects of the pathogen, such as the spike protein. However, the specific response isn’t limited to just one aspect such as the spike protein, but can recognise different proteins and develop antibodies to all of them.

If all else fails: If these aspects of the immune system are being overwhelmed, then there is a higher level of non-specific response which is more destructive and includes the cytokine storm that “napalms” everything, including sacrificing aspects of self, in order to kill the pathogen with the expectation of repairing the damaged self later. It’s better to live and need repair, even if the repair isn’t 100% than die, right?!

As has happened with COVID, this cytokine storm itself can be too widespread and severe and can hasten the death of the infected. It could be argued that this is nature’s way of speeding up the path to death in those who aren’t going to survive anyway, on the basis that a quicker death causes less suffering than a slower one. 

Natural Infection

From the above, you can see that a natural challenge with SARS-CoV2 can be dealt with at various different levels. If local immunity is sufficient then it is highly likely that you will be asymptomatic or have very mild symptoms. 

You can also see that a nasal swab can pick up viral remnants from this localised battle and if the number of cycles (Ct number) the PCR test is repeated is excessive it will find these fragments. Anything over 25 cycles means that there is insufficient virus present in the original sample for the individual it was obtained from to be considered infectious and should not therefore be counted as a “case”.  The fact that the NHS, FDA and WHO etc recommended Ct >40 indicates how the “case” numbers were massively and deliberately inflated in order to justify calling it a pandemic to describe what is similar in fatality to seasonal flu.  You have to question why such an excessive Ct number was deliberately chosen, and why those who called it out as an error were/are suppressed.  This was no accidental error, or else it would have been corrected very early on.  The recommended Ct was reduced later after many months, and just so happened to coincide with the roll-out of the jabs, thereby making them look far more efficacious than the approx. 1% absolute change in risk they actually are. How convenient.

Any virus that managed to get past the local immunity next encounters systemic immunity. The initial non-specific response may only have reduced knocked the level of infections, during which time the specific immunity that has already been initiated is then at sufficient levels to destroy the rest.  In the frail, or where the immune system is weakened or due to nutritional deficiencies such as Vitamin D, Zinc etc or compromised due to comorbidities, this response is not enough and the body goes into overdrive and initiates the cytokine storm etc.   

Where SARS-CoV2 differs from other natural infections, is that it isn’t a natural virus. It’s a Coronavirus that has had it’s spike protein artificially modified in Wuhan lab to be a bioweapon.  There is a reverse transcriptase domain that have been added from HIV that encourages the inclusion of the viral RNA into the host genome which has been suggested is the reason why some people get “long COVID”. There is a domain that is homologous with cobra venom neurotoxin that attacks the nervous system, and there is a domain that promotes the formation of prions and Lewy Bodies that are the precursor to Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSEs), Parkinson’s Disease, Multiple Sclerosis etc.  The spike protein facilitates entry into host cells by binding to ACE2 receptors and thus increases the likelihood of modifying the host DNA.

When natural infection induces specific antibodies, these are of 2 types. One group are neutralising antibodies which are the most beneficial kind and prevent/reduce entry into cells.  The other group are binding antibodies which increase cellular influx by another means that bypasses the ACE2 receptor and sets up mass inflammation. It is this binding antibody response that tends to move the overall immune response towards the inflated non-specific response including the cytokine storm.  The fact that there are ACE2 receptors throughout the circulatory system in the lining of every blood vessel, means that there is body-wide distribution and holding of the virus in every organ. Provided there is sufficient neutralising antibody production then the virus is destroyed. Where there is insufficient neutralising antibody and an organ’s own local immunity is overwhelmed, then the binding antibodies facilitate uptake within that organ and the induced cytokine storm causes damage. This accounts for the multi-organ involvement in COVID.

Gene therapy effects

With the gene therapy pseudo-vaccines, mRNA (Pfizer & Moderna) or DNA (AstroZenica) is introduced directly into the deltoid muscle of the shoulder. Unlike proper vaccines, the jabs are designed to bypass the immune system. With the Pfizer/Moderna jabs, the mRNA direct the recipient’s cells to manufacture the spike protein outside the nucleus which in turn then stimulates the immune system to generate antibodies. The AstroZenica product carries the spike protein coding in DNA form so goes into the nucleus from where it then directs the recipient’s cells to manufacture the spike protein. 

As Robert Malone MD (inventor of mRNA "vaccines") pointed out in a recent LinkedIn post, conventional vaccines contain definitive doses of the antigen which induces a somewhat predictable response. With gene therapy pseudo-vaccines, because the body generates the antigen itself, there is no control over how much mRNA is activated and/or how much spike protein is being manufactured. The response is therefore unpredictable, and if, as has happened with these products, they are at the upper end of the predicted safety curve, the margin for error is small and significant VAERS (as we are seeing) should be no surprise.

There were huge assumptions declared despite prior evidence to the contrary that the RNA/DNA introduced in the jab stayed where it was injected in the deltoid muscle and did not get incorporated into the recipient’s DNA.  Subsequently, there has been substantial evidence to indicate that the encoding material introduced by the jabs disperses throughout the body with predilections for certain sites in the body such as the sciatic nerve, spleen, ovaries and testes.  There is also evidence that the coding for the spike protein can be reversed into the host DNA and thereby produce spike protein as an ongoing process. This isn’t theoretical. It has happened.

Despite the known gain of function domains it was also declared that the spike protein is harmless, when in fact it was already known from previous SARS vaccine attempts (that either killed the experimental ferrets or caused hepatitis in those that survived) that subsequent infect with wild type SARS caused Antibody Dependent Enhancement which is the highest level non-specific inflammatory response that includes the cytokine storms. This was heavily linked to the spike protein in SARS and was found during past trials for that vaccine to be usually fatal.  It was decided that this means of testing wasn’t necessary for SARS-CoV2. Why not?

It was also discovered months ago that the coronavirus is just the vector to deliver the bioweapon – the spike protein, which is capable on its own of causing the full range of pathology seen in COVID.  There was also an assumption that the self-manufactured spike proteins would stay on the cell surface within which they had been produced. This has also been found to be untrue. They can cleave off and circulate round the body.

As you can see, having one of these jabs is nowhere near as safe as the Government and many within the medical profession are telling us. This declaration is based on no knowledge because none of the products have completed their full trial and insufficient time has passed for the unlikely assumptions to be checked.  As it happens, these assumptions have already been proven wrong well before the end of the ongoing trial and yet there has been no let-up in pushing these jabs. On the contrary they are being illegally mandated which goes against to the Nuremberg Code and our inalienable Human Rights.  In the UK and elsewhere the program has even been widened to include children as young as 12 who have virtually zero risk of getting seriously ill or dying from the natural infection.  There are no words to describe how criminal and negligent this is, other than can only be considered to be intentional infanticide.

The population of antibodies induced by the self-manufactured spike proteins are not the same as those produced through natural infection.  Spike proteins can only stimulate antibody production against itself. There are no other natural antibodies produced to any other aspect of SARS-CoV2. The other difference is that the jabs stimulate a reverse proportion of neutralising and binding antibodies such that the more dangerous binding antibodies are dominant, increasing the likelihood of a subsequent ADE if another wild-type SARS-CoV2 (and possibly other coronaviruses too) are encountered. Whilst from a quantitative perspective there is a comparable immune response to the jabs, the qualitative comparison is nowhere near as good for the jabs. Natural immunity is king yet is being denigrated by those “scientists” calling the shots who know better.

The other important aspect of the spike protein is that it contains sequences and domains that are very close approximations of sequences and proteins found in up to 26 different tissues in the human body.  The induced spike protein antibodies will therefore see these naturally occurring sequences and domains in the recipient’s body as foreign to varying degrees which has significant potential for auto-immune diseases. It’s only a matter of time as to when it starts.

In short, the jabs amplify everything that is dangerous about SARS-CoV2 whilst eradicating all the levels of natural immunity that enable the body to cope with the viral infection with the least possible damage.

Transfection dangers

Transfection occurs when somebody who has been infected either naturally or artificially passes on material that can lead to disease and/or symptoms. 

The obvious situation is infection where complete SARS-CoV2 passes from one infected person who displays symptoms (which means their viral load is sufficient to cause infection) to another. If the recipient’s own immune system is strong enough they will mount a natural immune response as described and recover, with/without displaying symptoms. Those who recover from natural infection will retain memory cells and are immune for as long as their immune system stays strong into old age. At some point in old age the immune system is not sufficiently strong, and the individual will succumb to whichever disease is currently circulating that they contract and are unable to fight off. However much we may dislike that idea, that is what happens and it’s inevitable for everybody who doesn’t die of heart disease, cancer or another organ failure. There were so many more vulnerable old people 80+ years old in 2020, because there had been 2 years preceding with less than averagely fatal respiratory viruses. Even so, the death rate in 2020 was still no worse than previous bad years when influenza had been more severe, such as 2017/18. 

Due to all the different levels and subtleties of natural immunity although it is possible for SARS-CoV2 RNA to be incorporated into an infected person’s DNA, it is much less likely than with those who have been jabbed, and consequently may probably produce lower levels of spike protein on an ongoing basis as a result.

When it comes to the jabs, it’s a different kettle of fish. The local immunity has all been bypassed and there is a sudden exposure to a large 50 billion mRNA insult, that leaks from the muscle and spreads all over the body via the blood.  The body then produces large amounts of spike protein (do young people do this much more efficiently?) that again distributes this bioweapon throughout the body too.  As Dr Richard Fleming recently indicated, there is also a replicase domain on the spike protein that promotes self-synthesis and an enhanced (but poor quality) immune response. He also explained that there is evidence of antibodies to the viral capsid too which rather suggests that the mRNA/DNA codes for more than the spike protein. Why haven’t we been told this before?

It makes sense that cells that are dividing more frequently, as happens with growing individuals, are more vulnerable to incorporating circulating mRNA/DNA into the new cell genome. Once there it self-replicates and is passed onto subsequent cells that evolve from that cell as it is replicated and divides.  More cells with spike protein encoding obviously produce more spike protein (bioweapon) and increased adverse effects. More spike protein induces more antibody production too and resultant increased likelihood of autoimmune disease against those tissues that are sufficiently similar to the spike protein.  I don’t see why the immune system won’t become exhausted too with so much antibody production?

With SARS-CoV2 infection, children have been found less likely to pass it on than adults and their stronger immunity is therefore more protective and contributes more to natural herd immunity. With the jab, there is a likelihood that they will be more severely impacted by VAERS and potentially more likely to be a source of transfection IMO.

When it comes to adults who have been jabbed, how likely is it for those of us who have politely declined and told BoJo to fuck off, to get transfected from them?  This topic has led to some rather polarised and extreme opinions as I see it. 

I think we need to bear in mind that everything in nature tends to happen across a sliding scale and that there is also a natural bell curve distribution of occurrences too. That bell curve may extend across the whole spectrum of possibilities as the first diagram below shows, or it may sit as a narrower bell curve somewhere along the whole spectrum of potential outcomes as in the 2nd picture below where the normal distribution curve is towards the lower end of whatever range is being measured.  

The takeaway message is that we cannot say that an event will happen in 100% of cases unless we already have proof for it, which in the case of this SARS-CoV2 situation, we don’t. We do have some information however, and so we can hypothesise some possible situations and outcomes.

Firstly, the risk of spreading spike protein coding – ie mRNA/DNA from someone who has been jabbed is very low under normal circumstances IMO. A possible exception may be if someone gets the flu jab at the same time and is demonstrating flu-like symptoms from it that coincides with the spike protein production being at its highest.  This could potentially result in higher levels of spike protein shedding.  We know mRNA/DNA can spread from the site of injection via the blood, but unless it is passed via a blood transfusion I fail to see how this genetic coding could get somewhere that could be passed on in volume. It would have to avoid both the jabbed person’s immune system to reach somewhere like the lungs, urine, saliva etc, and then survive being passed to me and then avoid my immune system, and then incorporate into my DNA. I think there are too many fraught steps and it’s highly unlikely to be successful even if it gets out of the recipient’s body.

We know that mRNA/DNA can be incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA, but again, this is unlikely to be in every tissue, let alone every cell as some videos have hinted. There then has to be a way for the spike protein being produced on an ongoing manner to become available to me. We know that spike protein travels in the blood and can therefore settle out in different locations.  Spike protein has been found in bodily fluids such as sweat, saliva, breast milk and urine. This implies it has bypassed the jabbed person’s own immune system to get out!!  Great jab efficacy then…. not. Nearly 1000 babies have died according to one Dr’s video I’ve seen from suckling mothers who have been jabbed.  That tragedy is beyond words.  If the spike protein is making it out of a jabbed person, it also has to be produced and shed in sufficient numbers to cause me a problem, but in all likelihood is going to be a bigger problem already in the person producing it. It seems logical of course that a dose that may not affect me could be far more significant in a baby or small child.  Even assuming I somehow come into contact with a bodily fluid containing the spike protein it also has to get past my immune system, and in sufficient numbers to cause symptoms.

Even assuming this happens in a small way once or twice, my immune system will be stimulated to produce antibodies against the spike protein that I would hope would be able to deal with any future encounter, as it would with any other re-encountered pathogen. I may get a few localised symptoms from a transient encounter with someone shedding an unusually large amount of spike protein, but the chances of meeting lots of such people close together sufficient to cause a big problem is slim, ….  I think!  I would expect to be able to cope with multiple low level transient encounters in the same way I cope with any other common pathogen in the environment that I already have immunity to, and indeed such regular contact ensures my immune system is maximally ready in case its needed. I therefore think hiding away from everybody in fear doesn’t do anybody any favours either. Zero SARS-CoV2 isn’t going to happen, and neither is zero spike protein in all probability either.

Where I see possible significant problems, potentially on an ongoing manner are situations where members of the same household are in close proximity on an ongoing basis and there is one or more members of the household who have been jabbed, and members who haven’t.  The closer the proximity and the greater the exchange of bodily fluids (how romantic!!) the greater the risk.

The key thing, as I see it, is therefore keeping my immune system as strong as possible using all the usual supplements etc. The odd brief encounter with a spike protein may provide some immune benefit provided the burden stays well within my immune capacity. I know there’s no safe level of prions, but I don’t envisage a spike protein gaining sufficient access to my body or hanging around long enough to cause a problem!  The elderly and those on immunosuppressive medications are likely to have a lower threshold as you’d expect. I won’t be seeking out regular close social contact with known jabbed individuals and a relationship with any girl who has been jabbed is definitely out.

Stories of exceptions to the above may emerge in which case I may have to re-evaluate. I think the danger to spike proteins is the same as to any other danger – it’s a function of level of exposure and exposure time. Individuals will have their own threshold of susceptibility of course too dependent on their general health status.

As far as I’m concerned, the situation for those of us who are unjabbed remains the same. We have to learn to live with SARS-CoV2 and spike protein,  be aware of the risk factors and live accordingly.

Extreme Nazi Mengelian behaviour by the Conservative Communist Party (CCP) of the UK

Unfortunately, the political agenda is far more concerning. Mandating anything medical in anybody against their will is Nazism that the Nuremberg Code sought to ensure was never repeated.  What Joseph Mengele did was abhorrent, but the numbers BoJo, Hancock, Witty et al are looking at forcing an experimental procedure on are on another level. Nazism would apply to mandating anything against people's will even if it has undergone full clinical trialling and assessment prior to authorisation. To even consider mandating something that is not only experimental, but where the vast majority of tests required for any other medicine have been virtually totally ignored for a condition there is virtually zero risk of dying from for the vast majority will require a new entry in the dictionary of “Johnsonian Genocide”. 

In the video below, Dr Peter McCullough (most published cardiologist in history) explains how much the "vaccine stakeholders" eg Bill Gates, Vallence et al want a needle in every arm. He says this whole Plandemic has been about the "vaccine", but I think it goes further than that, and every step has led the lemmings to the next cliff edge to jump off.  The "virus" and associated fearmongering was the training for what was to follow. Lockdowns are a test of compliance. The "virus" was  overstated to justify the "vaccine" and together they are being used to justify mandating vaccination which has 2 purposes.

  1. Depopulation, starting with the eldest first
  2. Justification for Vaccination Passports, Digital ID 2020 and ultimately absolute control via centralised digital currency and social scoring.

We need to break this progression, and stand up for our Human Rights and freedom to self-determine what we allow into our own body. The Governments work for the people, yet currently the tail is wagging the dog. We need to bring that tail back under our control and remove all unhealthy infestations.

Those who have been jabbed may be wondering why I haven’t addressed that situation above. Unfortunately, there will be very few at the lower end of the normal distribution curve for whom having been jabbed will have no adverse consequences. Given that it is highly likely that the majority have some spike protein encoding within their genome now, it’s a matter of time before ADE or prions do what they do….   Whether knowingly or unwittingly, the jabbed have turned their body into a factory for a bioweapon spike protein.  You can but hope and pray you're at the lower end of the production scale.

Share:

Related Posts

War Criminal Boris

War Criminal Boris

Detention!

Detention!

p53

p53

This new website

This new website

Generational Effects

Generational Effects

EMFs Compromise Immunity

EMFs Compromise Immunity

Technocracy begins

Technocracy begins

A year on

A year on

Corruption

Corruption

Jib-Jab Repercussions

Jib-Jab Repercussions