Rabbit holes

Graphene and other Rabbit Holes

Since I started posting on FB and more recently blogging here, I often get sent links and information to comment on. It’s interesting to see everything that’s out there, but it’s important to assess whatever narrative is being pushed whilst being mindful of the whole bigger picture. It’s very easy to focus on the one angle that is the subject of the link, especially when there has been some poetic license woven into some truth. On first sight it may seem very plausible and outrageous

People have a tendency to see patterns that don’t necessarily exist and make progressive links, that in themselves seem logical and fit a pattern of expected behaviour of whoever the idea involves, but ends up with a conclusion for which there is very little evidence and often doesn’t make sense if you start to fit this whole concept into a wider picture.

Let’s take rabbit holes as an example!! The UK has rabbit holes made by rabbits that like to burrow.  Australia also has rabbits and rabbit holes! Ergo, if you don’t consider any other knowledge, rabbits in the UK and Australia must have connecting warrens, and because rabbits pass close to the hot core of the earth they are therefore heat resistant! A quite ridiculous scenario I hope we all agree, but a progression that seems logical and not totally unreasonable if taken at face value without incorporating any other external knowledge.

SARS-CoV2 exists

There has been a myth from early on in the Plandemic that the SARS-CoV2 virus doesn’t exist just because it hasn’t been isolated to the point of being able to be proven through Koch’s postulates. On one level I understand this, although with a virus being non-living and requiring host cells for replication it isn’t exactly the same as for bacteria. As Dr Richard Fleming and Dr Kevin McCairn have shown in a number of their online presentations, there are electron microscopy pictures of SARS-CoV2 and the unique changes they induce in cells in the lungs. It is not unreasonable to consider that the causal pathogen in those with symptoms is going to be present in highest numbers and therefore most visible.

SARS-CoV2 is only the transport for the spike protein anyway, which we now know has the gain of function domains and also plays a major role in immune priming leading to Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE). Surely there has now been enough research on the spike protein and its effects to recognise that it’s real? If it’s real and SARS-CoV2 isn’t, how did spike proteins get into the bodies of those who have gone on to have COVID, by which I mean the full-blown hospital critical care situation… and Long COVID too?  None of the other theories not involving a virus ever explain this crucial aspect. They must therefore be wrong.

100% Proof isn’t always possible.

There have been many examples in science where theory predicts something that isn’t easily provable. In some cases, science has progressed to be able to prove or disprove them. In other cases, it’s not so straight forward. As an example, the early Periodic Table had many gaps when Mendeleev first developed it, although he predicted these elements existed. The existence of some elements is very difficult to prove, especially those in the radioactive series that are very unstable, or some that are very rare, the inert gases, or maybe found as salts rather than as the element itself. One of the fundamental particles of matter, the Higgs Bosun, was predicted but not found for many years until recently. Much in science is theoretical, but it doesn’t mean it’s wrong just because current knowledge and techniques struggle to verify it.

Exosomes

Coming back to SARS-CoV2, it may look similar to an exosome that develops to remove cell debris etc from cells, and exosomes may indeed contain fragments of RNA from SARS-CoV2 after our immune system has broken it up – fancy that being able to happen, eh?!!! BUT, it does not mean that SARS-CoV2 are exosomes.

5G

We now know that the spike protein on SARS-CoV2 causes inflammation through interaction with ACE2 receptors which are present in every blood vessel, hence some individuals have experienced multisystem pathology.  It also interferes with P53 that is part of the body’s natural defence against DNA damage leading to cancer.  We also know that Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) increase inflammation through interference of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) and also interfere with P53 activity, BUT, it does not mean that there is no virus and COVID is caused by 5G, or any other EMFs. 5G is most definitely a part of the bigger picture going forward, but it isn’t the whole picture in its own right either. People have experienced COVID in areas without 5G.  All EMFs play their role in immune suppression that facilitates SARS-CoV2 infection and increases SARS-CoV2 replication, but that’s as far as the current involvement goes.

Graphene Oxide

The latest theory to replace SARS-CoV2 is graphene oxide (GO). I’m not doubting that GO has been found and filmed under an electron microscope within the Pfizer jabs. Their presence is clearly not great, but we don’t know if it is a contaminant from say water filters, or lack of water filtration?! We don’t know if it’s intentional or what the reason is, if it is. The presence of contaminants is well established in vaccines, so to consider that there are none in these jabs and everything present is therefore deliberate and with malicious intent rather ignores past experiences.  On the back of this unreasonable assumption is where conjecture has come in and some (lots of) poetic license too, which ultimately doesn’t help conspiracy truthers get the truth out.

I saw one video where the symptoms of GO in the body were listed and just so happened to match the exact symptoms of severe COVID.  It all sounded very convincing until some research into GO revealed there is a debate over the safety of GO in the body! Far from the list that conveniently matches COVID there are some GO researchers who have published this paper that considers both sides of the toxicity debate. On one side, Go is considered to be inert and could even be used to deliver targeted pharmaceuticals to certain cells, whilst others say it could potentially impact the immune system depending on flake size and number. Such dangers are really being talked about in terms of people who might work with GO in industrial situations as detailed here. Overall, there are no indications that it causes the symptoms of COVID in the amounts that could possibly be present in a jab. Obviously, anything that adds to any sort of inflammatory response isn’t going to help, BUT, it doesn’t make GO responsible for all inflammation in the body.  I would suggest that we all have considerably more nanoparticles of plastic etc accumulating, but nobody mentions that!!!

Graphene has been suggested to be the cause of incidents of magnetism seen with some people who have been jabbed. I find this very doubtful if we consider the volume of liquid with GO contamination that is injected into the body.  For the amount in one jab to cause the supposed levels of magnetism seen in a body, the bottles of Pfizer product would have to be 5 times stronger, and I’ve seen no evidence of any magnetism being demonstrated with a bottle of product prior to injection. You’d expect such magnetism to enable the bottle to just stick to a fridge door!

It has also been suggested that GO circulating in the body could increase receptivity for 5G in future. Given that it can enhance battery function, maybe this is possible to some degree, but I question whether the amount present in a jab is of sufficient quantity. Maybe if it is not a contaminant but is a deliberate inclusion, the inclusions are of a certain size that selectively responds to a specific frequency that induces a physiological response that we don’t yet know? This is highly speculative to say the least, with little to no proof of this wild theory. Maybe its just added with the intention to start accumulating, and over the years and with multiple jabs it just increases the inflammatory response? Personally, knowing what the spike protein induces and can do, I see no reason to deliberately include GO, or anything else in any of the jabs. They’re dangerous enough, and if Luc Montagnier is correct, those who have received the jabs (and GO) aren’t going to be able to be controlled in the future anyway…

Some of you, like me, may also have seen advertisements for clothing that contains graphene as an advanced garment material. If it was really that dangerous and the risk of breathing in fibres could lead to COVID symptoms, I don't think it would be allowed to be used in this manner which could theoretically expose large numbers of the population to particles from clothes.

If we come back to the no virus rabbit hole, we have to consider what virology as a subject is and what virologists are working on if viruses don’t exist?!!  What are the electron microscopy pictures of viruses if they aren’t viruses?!! Why would the Chinese Military Medical Science Press publish a book on how they have weaponised SARS, and why do patents exist for such man-made viruses? You can't have it every way... 

Don’t let them off the hook

More importantly when it comes to SARS-CoV2, if we deny the existence of it then we deny the gain of function research and let Dr Fauci, Dr Daszak and others involved in the funding, and those who did the bioweapon development research off the hook.  This would nearly be as criminal as what they have done. If we consider that SARS-CoV2 mutates every 10 hours anyway then who knows if the original mutant strain first released from the lab in Wuhan even exists any more? There are now sooooo many different variant strains that naming any of them is quite ridiculous. We know they are very close variants with tiny differences that are insufficient to alter the ability of our immune system to recognise and fight it, once programmed to SARS-CoV2 naturally. Immunity derived from jabs is less comprehensive of course, but even this has been claimed to cover variants in the past.  There is also sufficient evidence to suggest that past exposure to SARS-CoV1 (SARS)  and past coronavirus infections from encounters with the common cold will convey sufficient T cell immunity that for the vast majority, a healthy immune system is more than able to cope with whatever tiny variants we encounter.

Let's be under no illusions. The ”variants” issue is the Government’s way of trying to cover up for the deaths from ADE that are already happening amongst those who have allowed their immune system to be primed and set up for it. This is why jabbed people are 6 or 7 times more likely to die than the unjabbed, and why the unjabbed are better able to fight off this insignificant variant. It supposedly accounts for 95% of current “cases”, the vast majority of which are in unjabbed and yet more people (in absolute numbers) who have been jabbed/primed are still dying from it. That doesn’t make sense if the delta variant is truly dangerous. The total deaths from this delta variant is around the 100 mark, yet still the  Government hasn’t lifted full lockdown and restrictions, and still they push the jabs despite all the evidence for their ineffectiveness and dangers...  To continue this unnecessary and dangerous narrative is therefore deliberate and evil.

Take your mask off and smell the BS before its too late ….

Share:

Related Posts

A year on

A year on

Slowly slowly catchy monkey

Slowly slowly catchy monkey

History teaches us

History teaches us

Armageddon it

Armageddon it

Irish Gestapo

Irish Gestapo

Church warning

Church warning

The Prions are coming...

The Prions are coming...

The Precautionary Principle

The Precautionary Principle

Technocracy begins

Technocracy begins

What Contradictions?!

What Contradictions?!