Save the Kids
I wonder how many people are aware of the Communist indoctrination-style songs children are being taught to sing in school at the moment about wearing masks and the jabs? Maybe it hasn’t occurred to parents that this is straight out of the former USSR, and current CCP manuals on brainwashing? Not only are they factually incorrect and give out a completely false narrative of safety and efficacy that does not exist, but the fact that such controversial and divisive subjects are being used in this way should be setting alarm bells ringing.
Einstein famously advised his students to question everything they are taught on the basis that many things that were once believed to be absolutely right, were later proven to be categorically incorrect! How many of todays children are being taught to question and critically appraise what they are being taught?
I have also heard that teachers are being encouraged to report parents of children who do not support the current Plandemic narrative. They are being categorised alongside Islamist extremists as potential terrorists. Freedom of thought and right to question is being fundamentally attacked in this way. It also threatens the integrity of the family unit as children are being brainwashed into thinking their parents are wrong to question and that their judgement isn’t good too. Teenagers of course are often rebellious in nature as they push back the boundaries whilst working out who they are and how hormones balance etc. The language used within mainstream media does nothing to support the truth either.
As this guy says in the video below, it is not OK for schools to tell pupils that they can disobey the wishes of their parents and decide for themselves if they want to take one of the jabs. It is the fundamental duty and right, and sole discretion of parents to make potentially life-altering decisions of this nature for their children. Children do not have the knowledge or understanding to make such decisions for themselves. Anyone administering a jab to a child against the wishes of the parents does not by definition have consent and there is no argument about whether that breaks the Nuremberg Code. It absolutely does, no ifs, no buts. Experimental medical procedures must only ever be done with the coercion-free and fully informed consent of the individual. For minors, this is the parental duty alone. If parents are deemed responsible for their children, this is for 100% of the time, not just when it suits the Government narrative. When parents are fined for any non-attendance at school because they are deemed responsible for ensuring the children attend, then the school has zero rights to remove that responsibility for any other reason. The wording of the songs above prove that the children are not being fully informed and are being fed misinformation. This is admissible criminal evidence against any school who jabs children against their parents' wishes in my book.
A recent study has demonstrated that masks are injurious to health for children who wear them. In the randomised trial performed in Germany they found that masks increase CO2 on average 6 times higher than permitted levels. It is the blood CO2 levels that control breathing and cardiac function. Schools which continue to mandate children wearing masks yet claiming to follow the science no longer have any justification for continuing this practice.
Giving jabs that are known to cause cardiovascular inflammation on top of the mask insult will be doing the body, and especially the brain, no good at all. Many adults who have been jabbed have complained of headaches and migraines which are symptomatic of harm being done to the brain by micro-clots and brain inflammation itself. There is no reason why children will be any different. It is known that young males under 30 years old are most at risk from cardiovascular adverse events, with some 20% at risk of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle). That figure came from an interview I saw with Dr Peter McCullough, the most published cardiologist in history. Bear in mind this 20% is what is being demonstrated clinically, and then consider that a significant number on top of this will have subclinical myocarditis to varying degrees, that may impact them later in life. Of course, blood vessels are present throughout the body, so we don’t even know what other body systems are also experiencing inflammation to a lesser degree, or less obviously. I assume this is more likely in those organs where there appears to be a higher predilection, although there have been reports of spike protein being found throughout the body.
All the gain of function domains of the spike protein have the potential to cause issues in children as much as they can in adults. Given the higher proportion of cells that are in division and multiplication because children are growing, it makes sense to me that there is a greater risk of DNA alteration and for the jab mRNA/DNA to be reversed into the genome in many more areas and greater numbers. The faster/greater cell multiplication etc may well accelerate the progression of any such issues arising too IMO. This is what proper animal studies and a proper clinical trial that has fully completed Phase 3 would be looking at prior to full authorisation. Children were not included within the original early phases of the jab trials, although some limited ones have been done since. The video below serves as a warning. The 12 year old girl living in the USA has had a multi-system life-changing adverse reaction. She was perfectly healthy prior to being jabbed and at virtually zero risk of dying from COVID. She had nothing to gain from being jabbed.
The temporary authorisations stipulate that whilst it is not precluded to give a jab to anybody who is not covered under the terms of the temporary authorisation, it is on the head of the administering Dr who has prescribed the procedure. The Gov are therefore absolving themselves of this risk. Manufacturers are also beholden to update the MHRA on any development in risks, yet I wonder if this is happening, and if so, how honestly? Those local authorities who have already jumped the gun because the final OK has not (yet) been given by PHE are therefore taking this risk on themselves as well as the Drs. In this instance, it is the duty of the Dr to also inform any parent who is giving consent of this aspect AS WELL AS all the VAERs risks. When herd immunity has already been achieved, there is zero foundation for anybody else to be given a jab, and sufficient grounds to make giving one to a child specifically contra-indicated, if not illegal.