What makes us Human?
In recent years I used to listen to Radio 2 when I was driving around the country to my vet clients. I never scored particularly well on Ken Bruce’s Pop Master quiz, but occasionally I knew the odd obscure answer, just as I got some of the easy ones (that I thought I knew) wrong! Jeremy Vine on his lunchtime show after Ken’s was sometimes incredibly annoying as he pushed the mainstream narrative, and I would have listen to something else; but it wasn’t all bad! Some of the topics and people he had on were very interesting. One of his regular but occasional features was What makes us human? Different people of note would philosophise about what in their opinion makes us unique as humans. It was thought-provoking to ponder on whether I agreed or disagreed with different points.
The last 18 months has demonstrated that we aren’t as evolved as we like to think! The vast majority have been very successfully manipulated by fear to act in what I consider to be a very primitive fear-based manner. It isn’t necessarily wrong to be guided by self-preservation, but the ability to think for ourselves and critically question what we are being told seems to be very much less prevalent in society than we might otherwise have thought previously. We all draw our line in the sand at slightly different points, but there is a completely irrational lack of perspective on the situation when those who are at virtually zero risk of dying from SARS-CoV2 ditch their trust in their own immune system and rush en masse like lemmings over the cliff to be willingly injected with a gain of function bioweapon! Buying into a totalitarian control system they would never previously have tolerated is another such irrational lemming act too.
Many who we thought wouldn’t fall for the Plandemic have.
It is a great example of the difference between knowledge, intelligence and wisdom. A higher education may mean you know more “facts” but it doesn’t mean people know how to apply them! Not having a higher education doesn’t mean you can’t critically appraise the situation and get a sense of what is really true in order to make a good decision either. The true meaning of intelligence is the ability to apply what you know. Wisdom is different again – it’s about knowing when to reveal what you know and/or your intelligence, which comes mostly with experience! Maybe it’s the dumbing down of education that has occurred over recent decades where learning reams of facts without having to learn how to assess and use them seems to have been championed?
Our Human Rights
The loss of our human rights is being challenged by Reiner Fuellmich and his team at Nuremberg 2. Papers have been served on BoJo, Hancock & Witty who have taken no notice whatsoever and are ploughing on with their Conservative Communist Party (CCP) agenda regardless. As humans we have inalienable human rights that have been established and written down in the Nuremberg Code, and Human Rights legislation both internationally and at national level too. It would seem a rather open and shut case when it gets in front of whatever judge or panel of judges will deliberate on the evidence presented.
One defence they may not be anticipating is that those who have accepted their gene therapy jabs are no longer considered to be human and are therefore not protected by any Human Rights legislation. This would be one reason to explain why there is such a strong push to give everybody the experimental gene therapy, including those who have virtually zero risk of dying such as children. Of course, anybody who refuses to be jabbed maintains their human status and thereby their legal protection under Human Rights legislation. IF this is being considered as a possible way to circumvent our legal rights, they will not want to leave any loopholes, ie anybody who hasn’t been jabbed…
This may seem rather ridiculous and far-fetched, but in 2013 there was a ruling by the US Supreme court on a case involving ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY ET AL. v. MYRIAD GENETICS, INC. Myriad Genetics Inc had filed patents to cover the human BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. These patents were quite rightly contested. As you would expect and hope, the Supreme Court ruled that natural products of nature cannot be patented. However, they ruled that synthetically create exons-only strands of nucleotides known as complementary DNA (cDNA) could be patented. This is what potentially leaves the door open for future stupidity.
If we now consider that it is now widely being accepted that SARS-CoV2 is an artificially made bioweapon and that the spike proteins are not a natural product of nature given that they contain the gain of function domains, then by definition the gene therapy pseudo-vaccines that direct the body to manufacture these spike proteins must be introducing artificially-derived mRNA (Pfizer and Moderna) and cDNA (AstroZenica) into the body. The spike protein contains an HIV-derived reverse transcriptase domain that promotes the incorporation of this genetic material into the recipient’s genome. We know this happens with natural infection of this artificial virus too. This won’t happen in every cell in the body, and there will be a sliding scale of how much this happens and individual variations as to within which tissues this occurs, but it has yet to be established whether this makes the recipients of these jabs legally a chimera of natural (DNA) and unnatural (cDNA) genetic material which might then classify them as transhuman rather than human. Would this place individuals outside of the legal protection offered by Human Rights legislation? If those who have been jabbed are ruled to be considered transhuman, do they lose their right to self-determination too? Are they owned by the State who paid for the jab?!
You may still think this sounds rather ridiculous, but the law is renowned for making seemingly ridiculous rulings when challenged at times…. If it were ruled that being jabbed makes recipients to be categorised as transhuman, I guess it might also question whether those who have been naturally infected (with artificial SARS-CoV2) are too?... and what about anybody who has received CRISPR gene editing technology treatments too?
This leads onto other potentially complicating factors.
Dr Richard M. Fleming has been publishing great work throughout the Plandemic and brilliantly explaining the true science that is being suppressed. Yesterday he did a long presentation (just under 4.5hrs) on the whole issue that I encourage you to watch here.
The bit of his presentation I want to draw your particular attention to in regards to this blog is the section starting at 3.04.30 where he discusses shedding from the jabs. For reasons he makes very clear, the jabs must code for more than just the spike protein as we have been led to believe. In the recent Harvard research paper that indicates that the components of the jabs travel throughout the body, and specifically to certain organs, the body makes antibodies not only to the spike protein, but also to the nuclear capsid of the virus. As Dr Fleming says, your immune system cannot produce antibodies to something that isn’t in your body. So where do they come from? He also notes that the immunological response to the jabs is significantly more than would be expected to just the spike protein. It would seem that these jabs have a self-amplifying aspect to them, which is achieved by including a replicase domain. To intentionally amplify the part of the SARS-CoV2 that has been established is pathogenic in its’ own right is a whole new level of stupid, equalled only by those who can’t possibly have done adequate research and who have agreed to take part in this gene therapy experiment.
It is all the more concerning when you consider that it has been known for many years that such products can cause ongoing shedding from the recipients. It would appear that studies to establish how much shedding occurs from individuals post these COVID jabs have not been done, or they haven’t been published if they have. Those of us who have wisely refused to take part in this experiment are in the dark with regards to our level of risk.
Germany takes away the right to self-determination
Does this explain the recent change to legislation in Germany allowing the authorisation of self-amplifying vaccines which suspends and effectively removes the human right of an individual to refuse to have their body contaminated and potentially genetically altered by shedding from those who have accepted the “mark of the beast”? I would hope that should the courts decide that having cDNA in your body makes you transhuman and outside human rights protection, that there is a distinction made between those who willingly volunteered to lose their human status and those who refused such direct influence.
In my blog The prions are coming! From a few days ago I explained the there is no safe level of prions in the body. In this presentation, Dr Fleming explains how mRNA outside of your cells, the only place it’s supposed to be, behaves like prions. Not only are those who have been jabbed shedding spike proteins, but IF the jabs are actually self-amplifying SARS-CoV2 complete with mRNA, they are effectively spreading prions too.
What is my danger?
In nature, everything happens across a sliding scale. With that in mind I don’t believe everybody who has been jabbed is shedding – it can only happen from tissue that can release spike protein/virus particles into a medium such as the air that I can come into contact with. The amount that they are shedding will also have its own scale in terms of amount being shed, which is likely to be at its highest immediately post jab
It is still my personal belief that unless you are in close proximity to an individual or group of individuals who are at the upper end of the range of shedding for a prolonged period of time, and on an ongoing basis, the amount of material I am exposed to is not likely to be sufficient or significant enough to overwhelm my immune defence to such foreign material. My best defence to both active infection and anything being shed by those who have been jabbed is still to maintain my immune system in the best condition I can, which includes not getting too stressed by worrying about things I cannot control in practice.
On this basis, I can categorically confirm that I will not be entering into any relationship with any girl who has had any of the jabs!