What's the purpose of Science?
The answer to the question posed by the title seems obvious to the vast majority of us, or should be. In my opinion, Science is a process of testing hypotheses in an objective and logical fashion in order to better understand how something works and functions because it helps humanity to move forward by knowing. Understanding the world around us achieves this through giving us a greater appreciation of, and respect for Nature and how our planet itself fits into the grand scale of things. Such investigative research generally increases our wider knowledge and understanding on a broad basis that may lead us to ideas that are solutions to the bigger picture problems. Other, more specific scientific research is more problem-orientated where we have a known issue that scientists are trying to find a more precise solution to. In all cases the purpose is to expand our knowledge, and our spirituality by helping improve the quality of life for all, and for our planet, so that we might “tread more lightly on the Earth”.
I totally understand that scientists and the scientific process costs money. However, the overall goal must remain to find the truth in all situations. When money becomes the primary objective and/or the power to control that comes with it, then science becomes corrupted and is pushed in directions that no longer serve humanity to its best advantage. It’s not a new truism, but it remains totally relevant today that just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.
The last 2-3 years has revealed the corruption that has been ongoing for decades in this respect, and the recent revelation regarding scientists re-engineering the Spanish Flu virus indicates that it is still very much ongoing.
https://www.technocracy.news/worlds-deadliest-virus-spanish-flu-reverse-engineered-recreated/
Not only are these scientists resurrecting a virus that no longer exists in nature, but they are now looking at increasing its lethality through gain of function (GoF) manipulation because it isn’t lethal enough?!!! The justification that they need to develop a vaccine is pure unadulterated BS. If this virus no longer exists in nature, and only in the lab where they’ve reconstructed it, then the only way Joe Public is ever going to be exposed and encounter it is if it is released from the laboratory, whether by accidental leak or deliberately. Without the possibility of encountering something there is zero justification for a vaccine or any other intervention. There is no legitimate purpose to doing such “science”. It doesn’t further humanity one iota, but conversely massively increases our risk.
Developing a “vaccine” against a disease nobody would ever encounter has only one function – to take money from the masses to concentrate it further in the pockets of the rich. The explosion in the number of vaccines now being administered to children, and the idea as voiced by Bill Gates that more vaccines are better and required suggests to me that the under-pinning of the next corrupt financial system after the current war-supported FIAT Ponzi system collapses is intended to be Pharma-driven; more specifically vaccine driven. The masses have to pay their taxes to buy unnecessary products that Governments would be manipulated into buying from privately owned criminal organisations such as Pfizer whose true motives have been revealed by the publication of their own falsified and manipulated COVID jab data that they tried to keep hidden for 75 years.
Unfortunately, such is the power of Pharma, that Governments and those entrusted to safeguard the public health have been as equally corrupted as the private organisations they serve. The WHO organisation has publicly stated that they rely on private financial donations to survive and that these “donations” are often tied to the desires of the donors. When the biggest private “donors” are Bill Gates and Pharma it is no surprise that the WHO is pushing their influence and funding towards increasing vaccination programmes. That the WHO has already been complicit in sterilising Kenyan girls without their knowledge via their tetanus vaccination program indicates the levels that these people and organisations will stoop to in order to push their wicked agendas.
If you read the paper, it’s obvious this was an ongoing programme for quite a number of years. Governments have no excuse for not being aware of the WHO involvement, and yet they are still trusting the WHO to declare “pandemics”, give out health advice, and still with the known influence of Bill Gates who has been implicated in such corruption by the ongoing investigations into his various programmes in India and elsewhere too. Not only do Governments still trust the WHO, but they take advice directly from Bill Gates too!! How much more corrupt can it get? Answer: very…
When a paper has been peer-reviewed and published in 2020 regarding a 10 year study into the health of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children, that revealed unvaccinated children are more healthy, the continuation and intended increase of vaccination programmes of the most vulnerable members of our society, who are totally reliant on adults to make safe decisions on their behalf, is a measure of the depravity that society has sunk to. Most parents are blissfully unaware of this paper. Hopefully, those who have been awaked by the COVID fiasco now know not to trust what you are being told, and to do your own research, but how many will reconsider the childhood vaccinations? There is evidence that some parents are, but why aren’t Governments?
Children are being given the COVID jabs with a drive to incorporate them into childhood vaccination programs, not because it improves their health when they have virtually zero risk from COVID itself, but because its licensing for children extends the immunity of the jab manufacturers from prosecution beyond the temporary authorisation, not just for children but maintains that financial protection in the event of an adult adverse reaction too. It’s all about the money. In the UK, 5-11 year-olds will no longer be routinely offered the jabs following legal action against the Government by one brave group of doctors and scientists et al, but it doesn’t mean it isn’t available if asked for. Once licenced for childhood use, albeit outside the routine programme, the manufacturers will still be able to claim their protection from prosecution for adverse reactions which is ultimately worth far more than the revenue from being made routine for children. They expect they’ll get them in later life no doubt… If given as part of a cocktail, as jabs so often are nowadays, it becomes impossible to identify the exact causal vaccination of an adverse reaction, and therefore liability becomes impossible to identify. How convenient…
The corruptive influence of money doesn’t stop at harming children, but has been starkly highlighted by the contradiction over the administration of the COVID jabs to pregnant women as explained by Dr John Campbell in the following video. Bear in mind when watching this that all the members of the JCVI were revealed to have close financial links to the B&MGF early on in 2020. It is no justification/excuse, but how can such a financial reliance on such a big industry player not have influenced JCVI decisions?
The main victims of course are the unborn babies who are being miscarried at never previously experienced before levels. Pfizer’s own suppressed data suggests miscarriage rates of nearly 90%. If undertaker reports are true, and I have no reason to doubt them, then baby deaths are at unprecedented levels too. It’s nothing short of infanticide. Dr Mercola explains why the COVID jabs should never be given to pregnant women, not that they’re safe for anybody in reality…
The scientific alternative
It’s all very well criticising the current system I hear you say, but what’s the scientific alternative? The truth is that what mainstream science tells us is unscientific, is as far from the truth as its possible to go. Although the quotes in the blog title picture were written by eminent past editors of 2 different eminent medical journals, the corruption of money/power is not restricted to medical sciences by any means. Suppression of scientific advancement has been rife. A rather ironic term in itself given that Royal Raymond Rife developed and proved a frequency device that successfully treated cancer in the early 20th century as detailed in one newspaper article in the early 1930s. He died unrecognised and totally disillusioned with humanity.
Nikola Tesla lost his funding into the research of electricity because he revealed that it could be distributed wirelessly, and his backer made his wealth from copper, which would have no longer been required for cables. Tesla himself pointed out that there is boundless free energy available that we could be tapping into. With the current hikes in electricity prices, it doesn’t take much imagination to realise how much easier life would be if we didn’t have to pay for electricity. How much more money would we have saved over many years if electricity prices weren’t factored into every purchase we’ve ever made?
Tomorrows World famously featured a water-powered car in the 1970s that has disappeared. Another inventor, Stanley Meyers, came to light in the 1990s who later “mysteriously” died of suspect poisoning. I’ll let you judge for yourselves here.
This wouldn’t be the first time technology capable of generating free/cheap power has been suppressed and/or has struggled to find a financial backer who wanted to use the technology ethically and to give the power back to the people, both literally and figuratively. I am involved at the fringes of such a project that has struggled to access funding for over 20 years. If anybody reading this knows of a multi-millionaire who has such funds and ethics, please get them to contact me.
Going back to the medical side, history has been dotted with devices and techniques that are clearly seen as a threat to the Pharma stranglehold on Medicine, along with the people who have failed to get their devices recognised except by “alternative” practitioners. Royal Rife and Wilhelm Reich are the best known to me, although the Scenar device I have been using for the last 25 years or so deserves to be far more widely used and accepted than it is. Bioresonance too in its various different guises deserves to be much more widely accepted. Homeopathy is of course the best-known modality that is very much suppressed and incorrectly labelled as being unscientific by mainstream medicine, yet is widely and very successfully used worldwide, especially in India where the Government officially recognises its benefits.
Those within mainstream medicine who utilise such devices and embrace the whole “energy medicine” concept are frequently ostracised and attacked in the same way that eminent Doctors and Scientists have been censored and suppressed for calling out the mainstream narrative over COVID. Many of us have had to endure these attacks for years. Even a Nobel Prize winner like Prof Luc Montagnier was treated this way after he published his experimental proof of the memory of water, and he was forced to move his research to China.
Trials to prove devices and natural modalities that rely on frequency and energy are as expensive as they are for Pharma, but don’t allow to individualisation of regimes and a truly holistic multi-modal approach as often used in a clinical situation. The nature of using frequency makes it virtually impossible to patent/protect the modality which according to the Pharma model that set up such trial procedures is necessary in order to recoup the investment. Whilst Pharma will often complain of the cost of R&D and testing to bring something to market, the system is set up to make it almost impossible for natural products to economically exploit. It is in effect a closed shop for Pharma. If a certain frequency were proven to destroy a certain virus or cancer, then what would prevent all and sundry from producing some sort of device to deliver said frequency? No frequency itself can be patented, and any frequency can be delivered in multiple ways. It doesn’t make the frequency ineffective, just impractical to prove in the manner scientists ae taught to only accept.
Similarly to Stanley Meyer, Prof Peter Gariaev “mysteriously” died, in his case a month after his Nobel Prize nomination, but he had previously experienced oppression of his work by colleagues, and theft of his equipment and results etc in Toronto by the Canadian Government. Wave Genetics has such amazing potential to help everybody, but money/power seems to take precedence. In the following video, Prof Gariaev explains a number of different ways he has successfully utilised his technique to help people back to health, but also where he has offered to help with global health issues in people and nature but has been met with stonewall silence. There is much suspicion surrounding his untimely death, reminiscent of the movie The Constant Gardener, a fictional work that was supposedly inspired by true events in relation to Pfizer.
If large corporations and Governments really are interested in helping humanity find solutions to the biggest problems and threats we all face then they wouldn’t stand in the way of progress. The WEF would have us believe they are trying to create a better future for all, yet is founded and relies on the very people and corporations who are interested only in feathering their own nests and who have been at the forefront of preventing humanity progress for the benefit of all and the benefit of our planet for decades.
It seems to me that science is now so bought and tainted that it is almost impossible to know what is reliable or not. Prof Cahill is one person who has investigated scientific research and has found evidence of systemic corruption of results and misrepresentation in published papers. Dr Richard Horton, ex-editor of The Lancet famously called out medical science in the past where he casts doubt on the efficacy of much that underpins mainstream medicine. He is not alone in having made such observations, but little if anything has changed.
Going forward, it seems to me that there needs to be a layer of detachment between those who fund scientific research and those who do it. If the funding for projects was paid into a central pot that a group of truly independent scientists distributed to the most appropriate research institutions so that those doing the research were blind to wh funded it that would be ideal. That way the funding of independent laboratories could not be pressured by those who currently directly fund their research, and they would be free to report genuinely independent and objective results without fear that publishing something negative would signal the death of any future contract, their laboratory and their livelihood. The system needs to be fundamentally restructured to take the brakes off progression and reveal the truth, however inconvenient it may be to those who are backing a certain project. Science needs to get back to its purpose, but is not alone in needing such a redirection by any means. Replacing the incumbents within the same system is likely to lead only to a repeat of the same corruption with a new set of faces. This is exactly what has happened in society at large over the past few decades where so much wealth has been ever concentrated in ever fewer individuals.
Over the last 2-3 years, the failings of Science have moved from the shadows for all to see - not just those in the know. The activities of those who by their title of "Chief", whether Scientist or Medical Officer, have been proven to be totally unscientific. When so many members of the public can see through their lies, and realise there has been little to no science behind their actions, their titles are rather misplaced and proven to have everything to do with politics, power and money rather than what the job description truly entails. Their negligence in failing to adequately (if at all) properly assess the data and modelling is nothing short of criminal and they should be held to account.
The chance for truth is coming...
When the formation of the intended NWO crumbles on those who are trying desperately hard to set it up, it will be perfect timing to re-establish the true purpose of Science, amongst many other aspects of life, and take the opportunity to bring forth the repressed inventions and ideologies that will hasten the advance of humanity for the better at 1000 times faster than we've been held back up to now.
