Who controls farming

Who controls farming

I was thinking about writing a blog on the various different angles of food production and farming that have often been reported on in the past as separate threads, but are actually all part of the same rope, but Robert F Kennedy beat me to it back in Feb 2021. As he explains, all roads lead back to Bill Gates, and I don't see the point of rehashing RFK Jr’s excellent article or reducing his content because I think everybody needs to appreciate how insidious and how widespread BG’s evil influence reaches.

https://tlio.org.uk/bill-gates-buying-farmland-welcome-to-neo-feudalism-a-closer-look-at-farmer-bill/

Since the above was written, there have been developments in farming and in other related areas that only confirm BG’s intentions to control every aspect of our health if he can, and if we let him. 

The hoax that is Climate Change is used to blame greenhouse gases on farming, and to justify culling cows in the Netherlands and Ireland in order to reduce methane release. It ignores the 10 year carbon cycle for methane, and the fact that the source of the methane was carbon and hydrogen from the grass and cereals the cattle ate that their rumen fermentation bacteria turned into energy for the cows and methane that they fart out. So, unless the planting of crops equivalent to the plants eaten by cows is also banned from being grown, the carbon released whether by farting, or plant degradation isn't going to change. Yet another way we know its a hoax...

It isn’t just farming that is under attack either. Our National Parks who are supposed to be preserving our indigenous animals and traditional ways of life are starting to reduce the number of ponies and animals allowed to graze on them too.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/apr/03/tory-mps-join-farmers-in-challenge-to-limits-on-dartmoor-sheep-flocks

From my experience as vet in the New Forest, grazing rights are strictly controlled in terms of numbers and go back generations. There is no reason why current day practices have any more impact than they did in past times. I suspect Dartmoor is similarly monitored and controlled by the agisters and verderers (or their equivalent) there. 

The use of prime farm land that should be used to make the UK self-sufficient in food again using sustainable regenerative farming practices so that food doesn’t have to be bought and brought in great distances using huge amounts of fossil fuels is instead sown with solar farms, whilst idiots in power discuss solar dimming to counteract “Global Boiling” because the weathermen decided to measure ground temperatures instead of the normal air temperatures to display on MSM news and weather reports in order to scare the public into accepting financial ruin due to the mishandling of the global economy.

Another Nobel Prize winner, Physicist Dr John Clauser has called out the hoax and the capture of “science” for political ends and faces the cancel culture for his honesty.

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/07/23/cancellations-start-for-john-clauser-after-nobel-physics-laureate-speaks-out-about-corruption-of-climate-science/

It isn’t difficult to make an argument that the intended use of mRNA veterinary medicines for our farm animals is just another angle of the drive to stop livestock farming and meat production. If, as my Open Letter of Concern sets out, the mRNA use in meat livestock were to cause the meat and potentially dairy produce etc too to become prionogenic then not only will potentially significant numbers of meat eaters become infected, but it immediately justifies putting an end to livestock farming. BG of course wins on all levels because he receives his 20:1 ROI income from the mRNA products, plus he could potentially buy up more farmland (more cheaply) whilst at the same time getting his ROI on his frankenmeat and other processed food investments. His farmland then gets used to grow ingredients for the frankenmeat whilst using GMO seeds and the AgroChem he’s invested in too.

Of course, it won’t just be meat-eating people who would be affected. Our pet carnivores (dogs and cats primarily) would have to either swap over to frankenmeat too at great compromise to their health, or people would cease to be able to own pets, which of course would suit the 15 minute cities where they would like us to all be corralled in future.

On the subject of frankenmeat, Greg Wallace and Michel Roux recently fronted a spoof documentary regarding the sampling and harvest of human muscle for cell culture and production of human meat products. I’m not ashamed to admit that I didn’t recognise it for being a spoof, but that’s partly because I’m aware of some of what reportedly goes on in satanic rituals, adrenochrome harvesting and child trafficking etc, some of which is depicted in the recent movie “The Sound of Freedom” that British Board of Film Classification are still refusing to assign a certificate too. You have to question why when they are happy to allow gratuitously gruesome horror to be shown in UK cinemas and streamed into homes. A recent paper discussing the development of human-based frankenmeat has been published.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41055-023-00121-x

The author says that the paper was written to initiate the discussion. To be fair, the conclusion states “that it is not acceptable to allow cultured human meat if we believe in values of identity, humanness, health safety, privacy or equality.”  The big question of course is whether society is still encouraging people to recognise and value all those different concepts. If we consider the intended amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations, it clearly walks over the human rights of the individual. How big a step is it before human frankenmeat becomes acceptable for real? The following video of Steakholder Foods shows what is possible already.

Regardless of this, I have no doubt that part of the reason for the spoof documentary was to pre-acclimatise the population to accepting frankenmeat derived from animals as it will no longer be seen as the extreme compared to what the spoof documentary revealed. If you drive a nervous passenger at 100mph (on the autobahn of course!) they are far more likely to be more comfortable with being driven at 80mph thereafter having survived the faster speed…

There is back-up plan to destroy farming and pet ownership of course too. A report in the USA has been produced that says the next pandemic is likely to come from animals. Yet another reason, other than the cover-up on bioweapons research in the Wuhan Laboratory, to maintain that COVID started as a viral transmission from a bat or pangolin in a local meat market. Of course, there is no justification for this conclusion unless you twist cherry-picked evidence to suit your narrative. If you think back hundreds of years to when there was little concept of sanitation and people lived in the storey above their farm animals, pandemics did not occur because of this much closer proximity every couple of years as they’d have us believe will happen now when animals and people are very much more separated. Indeed, the last declared “pandemics” including COVID have been nothing of the sort compared to what humanity has witnessed in our history.

As the diagram below shows, modern "pandemics" are all about spinning money from the masses via state taxes to pay big corporations whilst giving excuses for Governments to overstep their mandate in service to their people to over-exert their powers for increased control. Corporations are now bigger entities than Governments and ultimately weald more control it seems.

Going back to the IHR amendments and the intended Pandemic Treaty too, the provisions within them don’t just cover interference in human health. As I have pointed out in previous blogs, should the WHO Director General decide that there is a suspicion of a health threat for whatever reason, he/she will be able to unilaterally declare a pandemic, and demand legally bound responses from those who have signed up to the Treaty. The UK has indicated that we will be fully signed up to both the IHR amendments and the intended Plandemic Treaty under current UK Government policy.  Whilst the Government maintains that the UK does not hand over its sovereignty by signing up to these WHO statutes because they would have to enact provisions for the UK here first before they become UK law, there is no point in the IHR amendments or a Pandemic Treaty unless all signatories go along with it to the letter. Given that the UK has been instrumental in writing the original drafts, we would be under that much more pressure to accept the measures imposed on us than if we had not engaged in developing the concepts. If the country that wrote them won't stick to the resultant decrees why should anybody else?! To say that the UK does not give up our sovereignty by signing up is disingenuous to say the least. In such a situation, if the WHO DG decides that there is a risk of a pandemic from zoonosis, who knows what actions might be directed towards the supposed animal source(s)?

As the diagram above shows, the WHO has introduced the concept of One Health that brackets together human and animal health with environmentalism. This is a concept that the RCVS have been championing to vets in the UK too. Whilst I can see parallels between human and animal health in terms of something like antimicrobial resistance, I shudder to think what measures the WHO might try to mandate on animals, not just in the UK but worldwide should they decide that the animals are to blame for some human disorder. eg from prion diseases that you can bet they wouldn't accept might have been derived from mRNA veterinary medicines, should they be authorised.  No single person or centralised group of individuals, let alone the corrupt WHO, should EVER be given the capability and power to make such decisions on the world stage.  

I’m sure the vast majority of people reading this are also aware that BG is the biggest private "donor" by far (88% of private donations) to the WHO and the 2nd biggest “donor” overall behind the USA and ahead of all other countries. The WHO has also admitted in the past that their projects are largely directed by the wishes of donors. Given how subservient and wrongly the WHO acted over COVID (plus BG's prevalence especially until the "vaccines" were rolled out) it isn’t hard to see how vested interests such as BG, the WEF and others are able to feather their own nests and interests.

When much of the research I included in my Open Letter of Concern as references has been known about from before COVID too, that was ignored by the likes of Chief Medical Orifice Sir Christopher Witty, Sir Jeremy Farrar (who was party to the Fauci emails covering up the source of the Wuhan leak) and Sir Patrick Vallance (Chief Scientific Orifice) and both Witty and Farrar are taking up senior roles in the WHO, it isn’t difficult to see what a pit of vipers that organisation has become, and how vulnerable we would be to further corruption from that direction in potentially many different ways.

It is clear that globalists, both individuals and corporations have taken over, and Governments are little more than puppets for these entities who are now so bold as to not even bother with covering up their intentions. When the pieces of the jigsaw fit together so neatly, it rather indicates the pieces are in the right place, and if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it probably is a duck. We can but hope that their hubris will be their fcukaduck downfall!

Share:

Related Posts

Theft knows no Boundaries

Theft knows no Boundaries

Who controls farming

Who controls farming

It's a Digital world

It's a Digital world

Be prepared

Be prepared

WHO is Tedros?

WHO is Tedros?

Coronation Chicken

Coronation Chicken

Beware Britcoin

Beware Britcoin

Constitutional Crisis

Constitutional Crisis

Thoughtcrime

Thoughtcrime

Constitutional Law

Constitutional Law