WHO is Dr Tedros Ghebreyesus?
How did Dr Tedros Ghebreyesus, a career politician with no medical qualifications, manage to reach the heady heights of Director-General of the world’s supposed premier international health organisation that was supposedly set up to help bring health solutions wherever needed throughout the world for the good of the people? When you look back at his political career it has numerous skeletons that have been sufficiently well documented that they cannot even be considered to be in the closet. Despite a number of humanitarian criminal accusations that have been levelled at him that seem to have more than a little substance to them, he was voted in as D-G of the WHO and has been widely accepted by countries and leaders who should have refused to acknowledge the appointment of someone so controversial to such an important world role. The intended amendments to the International Health Regulations 2005 (IHR) seek to give total power to whoever is D-G of the WHO. Given that Tedros currently holds that position, it is only right and proper that the people of every nation signed up to both the WHO and the planned IHR amendments understand who will actually have the power to determine OUR health and dispense with our human rights at his whim, and potentially his alone.
Tedros started his political career by aligning with the TPLF, a Communist political organisation that later formed a coalition of left-wing parties known as the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front, that ruled Ethiopia until 2019. The TPLF was classified as a terrorist organisation in the Global terror database. Tedros was listed as the third most important member of the TPLF’s politburo standing committee.
As an important TPLF member, Tedros joined the Ethiopian health ministry and rose through the ranks to become the country’s health minister in 2005. During his tenure, which lasted until 2012, strong allegations emerged of the TPLF engaging in “systematic discrimination and human rights abuses” by refusing emergency healthcare to the Amhara ethnic group because of their affiliation with the opposition political party. In 2010, Human Rights Watch wrote a report on how aid in the form of food and fertiliser was withheld from local Amhara villagers.
Interviews by an observer group in 2009 with several people across three regions of Ethiopia yielded widespread suppression of political dissent by conditioning access to essential government programs on food and health. The report issued by the Human Rights Watch was scathing of how Tedros’s government used donor-supported resources and aid as a tool to consolidate power.
Given the strong ethnic fissures between the Tigray and the Amhara ethnicities, these allegations started gaining credence further as birth rates were recorded to be significantly lower in the Amhara region compared to other regions and two million Amhara people “disappeared” from Ethiopia’s subsequent population census.
By the time Tedros left office as health minister, the Amhara region was severely underperforming in health indicators when compared with the Tigray region, where Tedros originated from. The health coverage (physician to population ratio) was only a fifth in the Amhara region compared with Tigray, and infant mortality was vastly higher. For more detail on his earlier political career you can read an article on Tedros written in March 2020 by John Martin.
One of Tedros’s first appointments as D-G was to install Robert Mugabe, the infamous and brutal former leader of Zimbabwe, as a health ambassador for the WHO. Outrage forced Tedros to reverse his decision, but his willingness to align himself with Mugabe at all very much pinned his colours to the mast. It is no surprise therefore that he would seem to be totally supportive of CCP China (as is Klaus Schwab of the WEF), and dismissive of human rights that get in the way of a wider political agenda. We can but imagine the sort of “misinformation” suppression he would happily endorse that the WHO would like member States to implement in future.
Various politicians and Health professionals from a number of different countries have expressed deep concerns over the intended amendments to the IHR. Tedros produced the following video in an attempt to dispel criticisms and brand such concerns as conspiracy theory and misinformation, but as I will show in my video, the people dealing in misinformation is the WHO, and ALL the Governments of the world who are more than happy to sign away YOUR freedoms and human rights as they move against our will towards increasing authoritarian totalitarianism.
If you now watch my video analysis of the IHR amendments, it is clear that Tedros wouldn’t know the existence or meaning of the word “truth” if it punched him in the face!
Politicians such as Tedros remind me of Billy Connolly’s observations that a desire for power should immediately render anybody unsuitable and prevent them from holding any sort of position in public office whatsoever. His other observation was that politicians were often bullied at school because those who bullied them instinctively knew they would become politicians in future, and simply desired to try to knock some sense into them, and to punish their future misdemeanours in advance! Joking aside, they often seem to get away with behaviours and corruption that the rest of us wouldn’t stand a chance of doing in the wider community.
If you watch the following declaration of the EU’s “gift” to the WHO of their digital health certificate that has been in the pipeline for many years prior to COVID, it is clear beyond doubt where the agenda for digital identity and control is headed – IF WE LET IT. It is up to everybody to stand up and be counted in whatever way you can. When you put the control afforded by such digital health certificates alongside the power to mandate measures and override our individual rights afforded by the intended IHR, the combination amounts to a future that our forefathers fought long and hard with considerable sacrifice to avoid. We owe it to them and future generations to ensure we restore our inalienable rights that have been gradually eroded over time through the transfer of ever more power and wealth to the elite.
When you consider how wrong those in authority got the response to COVID since 2019 in every way possible from medical, economic and social perspectives, anybody involved in making those decisions and suppressing discussions should immediately be removed from office forthwith, tried for their crimes where appropriate, and never allowed to be involved in governance ever again. Instead, those who advocated mask wearing and experimenting with novel medical gene therapies on all ages including children and babies in utero are being promoted to higher positions of power where they will have greater opportunity to offend again to an even greater extent in future. From the UK this includes Sir Jeremy Farrar (WHO Chief Scientist) and Sir Prof Chris Whitty (currently still the UK Chief Medical Officer), both of whom are taking up senior positions of power at the WHO in readiness for the next Plandemic.
It is imperative that the UK leave the WHO immediately. It cannot be straightened out from within because those who fund it with vested interests such as Bill and Melinda Gates, and Pharma have bought their influence and interference to such a degree that the WHO has been guilty of too many heinous crimes over quite a number of years. Nobody can reasonably be expected to have any confidence in it going forward.
No right thinking person can have any confidence on any national politician who has stood by Tedros and the WHO either. Whilst they may have some had degree of good intentions to give them the benefit of any doubt, their ability to discern good from bad information and make a good decision is so fundamentally flawed with notable but few exceptions, that the rest cannot ever be trusted again. They refused to consider all the science, suppressed the voices of eminent experts who tried to warn them and in doing so engaged in totalitarian behaviour in contravention of principles set out in the Nuremberg Trials after WW2. Following orders didn't wash as a defence then, and it doesn't wash now.
It is clear that the entire financial, political and health systems et al are unrepairable. However, it is not all doom and gloom by any means. We must welcome and take this opportunity to replace the collapsing systems currently in existence with the version of the future we want it to be. We live in interesting times for sure, and we will get one opportunity to get it right going forward. Make sure you stand up and choose to be on the right side of history.